Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?

Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org> Mon, 04 November 2013 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150A511E821A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:28:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsYmlP3AFDlQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r2-chicago.webserversystems.com (r2-chicago.webserversystems.com [173.236.101.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8A521E82B1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-a56f.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.165.111]:59056) by r2-chicago.webserversystems.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <randell-ietf@jesup.org>) id 1VdTZP-000Gsh-6L for rtcweb@ietf.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 17:28:31 -0600
Message-ID: <52782D9E.3050905@jesup.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:28:30 -0800
From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/25.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <BLU169-W258033F7C441A07A1FA6D093F60@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU169-W258033F7C441A07A1FA6D093F60@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060300020003000201040309"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - r2-chicago.webserversystems.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jesup.org
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: r2-chicago.webserversystems.com: authenticated_id: randell@jesup.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Reflection of SRTP/SDES discussions at IETF 87?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:28:39 -0000

On 11/4/2013 3:15 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> At IETF 87 we had a discussion of SRTP/SDES.  In looking at the most 
> recent version of several documents, I didn't see the consensus of 
> that discussion reflected.  Was that because the consensus in the room 
> wasn't verified on the list, or some other reason?  Or maybe I missed 
> the text somewhere? Here is what seemingly relates to this topic:

I think people just didn't update them to match.

>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-07 Section 
> 5.5:
>
>    [OPEN ISSUE:  What should the settings be here?  MUST?]
>    Implementations MAY support SDES for media traffic for backward
>    compatibility purposes.
>
> [BA] As I recall, the room consensus was MUST NOT with respect to 
> SRTP/SDES, no?

Yes.  Strong consensus in-room (as best I could tell remotely)

-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf@jesup.org