Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs

[Roman Shpount <[e-mail]>]

As I have mentioned before I would like to see G.722 as a mandatory to
implement codec in addition to G.711 and OPUS. G.722 is license free and is
widely supported. It operates at the same bandwidths as G.711 with
virtually the same CPU requirements, but offers HD audio
quality superior to G.711.

One question I wanted to ask about G.711, do we require any of the
appendixes to be implemented, ie would PLC and DTX be required? I think
that PLC should be at least recommended, since it will significantly
improve resulting communication experience in most of the real deployment
scenarios.
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<[e-mail]>wrote:

>
> At the last meeting we took a hum on selecting Opus and G.711 as the
> mediatory to implement audio codecs. If there is any new opinions please
> send them to the list by August 30th, after which the chairs will make a
> determination of consensus.
>
> Thanks,
> Cullen
>
> Please note that the following IPR disclosure have been made on these
> codecs. They can be found at
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/
>
>
> 2010-11-07
> • ID # 1445
> "Broadcom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-00 and draft-ietf-codec-description-00 (1)"
> 2010-11-07
> • ID # 1446
> "Xiph.Org Foundation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-00"
> 2010-11-12
> • ID # 1447
> "Broadcom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-00 and draft-ietf-codec-description-00 (2)"
> 2011-03-23
> • ID # 1520
> "Qualcomm Incorporated's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-05"
> 2011-03-27
> • ID # 1524
> "Xiph.Org Foundation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-05"
> 2011-03-29
> • ID # 1526
> "Broadcom Corporation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-05"
> 2011-03-29
> • ID # 1525
> "Skype Limited's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-codec-opus-05"
> 2011-07-23
> • ID # 1602
> "Skype Limited's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-codec-opus-07"
> 2012-01-25
> • ID # 1670
> "Microsoft Corporation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-10"
> 2012-03-12
> • ID # 1712
> "Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-11 (1)"
> 2012-04-02
> • ID # 1741
> "Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-codec-opus-11 (2)"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>