Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 26 November 2013 23:23 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799E71AE05B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:23:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2zu4hO7bFyw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D171AE04A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p61so5987891wes.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i5qos58nxiGddt8IPcGfSlRbNCAZcdqyXQfqqxfwWJM=; b=shy32aPB9I13idj+US8BMS8MFsM+poGOoxOjkGuUUCM/pAHuiYia6mReiB7jXonCjb OmYbF8XaQ0FbeHdMRYU4zmVriaLbk169G30YSim7WYrpUSDBVcE4gFzZusXPCAzWxN+t KhMHzE/gnz1JcaMeF5a3Xu0YiRhluXvT2DbosyDy5OZ0cP3FaoGYtZRZMEPQnHbzDIvU dgMjdtT4chcJPRIn3hDAJ4qvELgmNXnm8s8WJbqoWwzsHI2ZSPb/p/4C+7FA4TXgifhL bjRZSrQZts1edCzRIf84TpSV0iGvmErj3LR+wfCIUTZLpaDZHhTtXsq9AzzrBI/+RddW 3jTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.208.49 with SMTP id mb17mr20231979wic.64.1385508179794; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.134.195 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:22:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52952B71.4090208@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <529528C0.40200@bbs.darktech.org> <52952B71.4090208@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:22:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWc-0jg6GtQUWFYfAQWdOfdpNhdWVJa_yfB=VYePrdsAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:23:02 -0000
On 26 November 2013 15:14, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > This WG could well select some > ciphersuites that you like better DTLS doesn't use RC4. It's a little tricky dealing with a stream cipher in datagram mode.
- [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered Stephen Farrell
- Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered Stephen Farrell
- Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Apparently TLS is IPR-encumbered Stephan Wenger