Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch: Final PRs

Adam Roach <> Mon, 22 July 2019 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83D9120359 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cwgJs8SwwGTl for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091F4120305 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x6METv92048023 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:29:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1563805800; bh=JyxM19Az8Nx78hiw2n7O3AiN4pTkGiv1NuqLDmoczp0=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BB5/g8qWwWklRDI8Ndz9/RCT60+xKL8z0PCrH65JYLev9XwH93XYBhluQb14tjutL s/+aEkFUp7V5IDEm6zi6oMEeCqAqt+eTGYN0bFoHspHAQDoAFhh3p1scC51xUu4nzn 6r8Ysj/goNJFSfKklGZjaWDOmRqYvaHuQhS1hpcg=
X-Authentication-Warning: Host [] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Sean Turner <>, RTCWeb IETF <>, Eric Rescorla <>
References: <> <>
From: Adam Roach <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:29:50 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch: Final PRs
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:30:09 -0000

In the interest of getting this into the editors' hands as soon as 
possible, I'm going to fix the reference in an RFC Editor note and put 
this document in the queue. No new version is necessary. Thanks.


On 7/22/19 09:54, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
> Jully 22nd is here so I am going to close this out and consider the PRs approved.
> ekr,
> Please spin a new version to incorporate the PR for the reference change.
> Adam.
> Once the new version hits the street feel free to hit the button to move this to the next state.
> spt
>> On Jul 10, 2019, at 19:12, Sean Turner <> wrote:
>> Hi! ekr has spun a new version of draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arc [0].  All of the changes were to address the outstanding IESG DISCUSS positions or were a result of following on discussions with Ben K (Security AD).  While I think all of these are good changes, there were three changes that affected 2119-language and we need to get the WGs take on these.  Two of these changes are in s5.1.4  (SHOULD->MUST and the addition of a new MUST) and one is in s7.6 (addition of a new SHOULD).  These are most easily seen by looking at the diffs [1].  If you object to these changes, then please let the list know by July 22nd.
>> Note that these are the last issues remaining before this draft as well as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security and draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling can move into the RFC editor’s queue.  At that point we will be dangerously close to be done.
>> Thanks,
>> spt
>> [0]
>> [1]