IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com> Sun, 19 April 2015 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D44A1B2CF0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n73QI_s_QKaq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9DD1B2CF6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t3JIpm6I020744 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:51:48 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id t3JIpfNh002948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:51:43 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.118]) by DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:51:35 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com>
To: ext Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
Thread-Index: AQHQeHFYVWMgQ5c0+UWIb1btRq1l3Z1SI8EAgAKN7AI=
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:51:34 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF81962D96C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <D8920B96-7C22-4F9F-B323-FC59120C7508@ieca.com>, <5531EFD2.5010107@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <5531EFD2.5010107@alvestrand.no>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [93.183.12.65]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1690
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1429469509-00007476-9F9448E3/0/0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/BQ3bdsbLNUKvGwhcrGdc9ZWLI-M>
Cc: "draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways@tools.ietf.org" <draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:52:19 -0000

+1 for adoption.

The same question that Harald raised came to my mind - there was another adoption call end of last year with a lot of support (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg14050.html).

Kind regards,
Uwe

________________________________________
Von: rtcweb [rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org]&quot; im Auftrag von &quot;ext Harald Alvestrand [harald@alvestrand.no]
Gesendet: Samstag, 18. April 2015 07:46
An: Sean Turner; rtcweb@ietf.org
Cc: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways@tools.ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways

On 04/16/2015 08:15 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> All,
>
> There’s been some interest expressed in having http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-gateways/ adopted as an RTCWeb WG item.  Please respond to say whether you support adoption of this work as a working group work item and whether you will participate in the discussion.   If you are opposed to this draft becoming a WG document, please say so (and say why).  Please have your response in by 20150423 23:59 UTC.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> spt
Naturally, I support adoption.

Question: Is this a repeat of the exercise on which Cullen reported
consensus for adoption in December 2014, or is this a side effect of
starting fomal tracking of adoption status?

--
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email