[rtcweb] Document review

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 July 2013 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A75511E8219 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id msoaQVfjEI4E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x235.google.com (mail-oa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768D011E8151 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so1508376oag.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=q1YblubB5bm0XKXy+oA5qsezQ9q0cAuLxTCZ8iQh7F8=; b=cEcyo/YlIjnZzR62mZhQfgSRsm4nTmt4PeyKDZ+lVdzFFME3F7uZBgxuBQDG5gz79G lfyiVmmFZSo8NA5fua2cj9QstDy0D8Lxx6Lex/awqeuNrU0v1lQqzMR9X9neZfV4wh/m pwxoLp9oCGFKV3y7Pdq4L0AViKMNtbmAnZ4/3xiJ6AX4G7SqQ58wtc2mqAjjq0ld+sWR 2BQVFl0+zDGTctxsOpNlDaVgtlI++2VoXR7JORau7SMjoInpCh3jqqM7t3x2iHx7vBp4 CqjtA2IxT9oS3D7qsXTtDlnM9dzpkGVMipKrfGZE/BU3fZ8lWebtc8hg5NZOqTgbOSaF nqGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.52.6 with SMTP id h6mr19560801icg.5.1374684283988; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:44:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBmkGSaFEusQgB3Ji2zevxovNXv85NG616RR-Lo=i8hZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3036361f6cef7404e244a044
Subject: [rtcweb] Document review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:44:49 -0000

Howdy,

Just a reminder to folks that review of the updated documents prior to the
meeting will help us make progress.  Please make sure that you have read
the unified plan document before the MMUSIC session, the data channel docs
prior to our session, and the updates to the security docs.  List
discussion on the documents is, of course, welcome now.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel/https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol/

Thanks,

Ted