Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Actionitems enclosed!)

"Ravindran Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0B821F8AAA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxSnr1wnmDQZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ma01.sonusnet.com (sonussf2.sonusnet.com [208.45.178.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ADD21F8AAF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonusmail05.sonusnet.com (sonusmail05.sonusnet.com [10.128.32.155]) by sonuspps2.sonusnet.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9573el3009919; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:03:40 -0400
Received: from sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com ([10.70.51.30]) by sonusmail05.sonusnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 03:03:07 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC832C.D3F98BE8"
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:33:04 +0530
Message-ID: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1450@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Actionitems enclosed!)
Thread-Index: AcyCruOHcWlrNpROT8Sx+TBJ63fzqAAe0Lqw
References: <CA+9kkMBi9BzDu=WOq3RG-o5nbfnUTftDg3LRBU3DFh=Kc4W5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ravindran Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
To: "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2011 07:03:07.0423 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5B6D2F0:01CC832C]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Actionitems enclosed!)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:00:02 -0000

Ted, Magnus, Cullen,

 

Could you please consider RTCWeb standard signaling protocol
(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-partha-rtcweb-signaling-00.txt) draft as
one of the proposal for this signaling discussion.
 
Thanks
Partha

 

From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Ted Hardie
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:31 PM
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB:
Actionitems enclosed!)

 

At today's Chairs call, Cullen, Magnus and I had a discussion of how to
make progress on the signaling discussion.  We feel the mailing list
discussion needs to have more concrete proposals in order to make
progress, and so we're putting forward the following:

1) If you plan to put forward a draft proposing a concrete solution in
this space, please send your name to the mailing list with that intent
by October 7th *THIS FRIDAY*.

2) Please have a -00 draft out for discussion by October 14th (the
following Friday).  This is to allow for a discussion and update prior
to the -01 deadlines.

3) We will hold a conference call to discuss the drafts on October 21st
(the Friday after that).

Updates based on that discussion then have until the -01 drafts deadline
to be complete.

This is aggressive, but we feel we need to have at least -00s for the
different ideas in place in order to make real progress.

thanks,

Ted, Magnus, Cullen