Re: [rtcweb] A problem with both A and B

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Thu, 23 May 2013 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <emil@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE18521F9633 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvXmLmSW4lWf for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22f.google.com (mail-bk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E5121F964A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jg1so1682942bkc.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=EHMNoUQ6ZimfVlWwX4FTqh+e1wHK11XPIal71OU0mR0=; b=FUn6xHrM1qapT+CxSZ6jzjYjBDijC1ew5dfufdmYUFGj/zHiVvMRwaOkg6q4BsSLQl jRfmncqbtrzzv+kzRqU/vnbyIIkh8HFOXBPG6Fnsfw7HxVep+EfO0MgcaX4wl9Dv01A5 LUhnL7he/k+IxA+YpRchUt1BDqWYPsBkqg3a7IejxEtg4AHl3v+fSI4ZZ6Iuwy1YUYed p6C2+rHhdXq5I//ZPf3qJT0xjhmIyNstTs+pdI3R+NnSVp3PCMgRiJ8acxqlEYMpZxGk anOdms+tnp+cXmZ4dH2pFjJUrF40iedktgGCiJZIh91IpAz4Ckw1QDFv1t6TrHjpQZoL RCvQ==
X-Received: by 10.205.76.129 with SMTP id ze1mr6160289bkb.12.1369302265452; Thu, 23 May 2013 02:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.3] ([212.5.158.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fh8sm2993298bkc.10.2013.05.23.02.44.18 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 May 2013 02:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <519DE4DE.8070508@jitsi.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:43:58 +0300
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Organization: Jitsi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
References: <BLU403-EAS40305B2D015B786CC67EB9293AC0@phx.gbl> <CABkgnnXX3zoeKqjFxjsfMgaGGRM0JzymaeWfA13LEjUZ4tGF9Q@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C373EF0@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519A4C9A.6020501@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C374F13@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519BD580.7080205@alum.mit.edu> <519C86EF.5080601@ericsson.com> <519CE696.1010606@alum.mit.edu> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C2D081A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAMRcRGRkH5evUDZUFKObWD3CjY4wGSGVHQfbLhuV6pQzDc0SJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMvTgccWBC+4GXJ_mjYj66Lmkhc_eTtr1G3nVC1u59ya1RLgtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGSOd7sEx71toD5PJrOS-2RhD3CtCWHP6Br+yf0YS0g8Lg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRcRGSOd7sEx71toD5PJrOS-2RhD3CtCWHP6Br+yf0YS0g8Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDxky7BPi3ZyEQ0/dfghishnNk+umzqmcp8cGUl/M7OyIFy4b+B4kYJhAIsOGIGz6dmLXc
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] A problem with both A and B
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:44:34 -0000

On 23.05.13, 12:40, Suhas Nandakumar wrote:
> What if the new source produces pre-encoded stream that is not been
> negotiated within the current session ? 
> example: video m=line with VP8 is setup and H.264 encoded camera is
> added as new source. This needs a O/A negotiation for the appropriate
> decoder context to be setup on the receiver side

Obviously this does require a new O/A but I don't see how that case is
related to adding and removing SSRCs which do not require O/A exchanges.

Emil

-- 
https://jitsi.org