Re: [rtcweb] which bandwidth modifiers need to be supported?

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B815C12D1EB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFWZqcQqNTJZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx11.unify.com (mx11.unify.com [62.134.46.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D3912D512 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.235]) by mx11.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id 30F381EB8496; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:55:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.37.243]) by MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.235]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Wed, 11 May 2016 17:55:32 +0200
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
To: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] which bandwidth modifiers need to be supported?
Thread-Index: AQHRntQ2kVygUM+ne0GaC9s4SM+26Z+z8baA
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 15:55:31 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF260FFABF@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <571DE213.8080306@goodadvice.pages.de>
In-Reply-To: <571DE213.8080306@goodadvice.pages.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Bes86vzAhwfZxRPmaTLKkVpPB8o>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] which bandwidth modifiers need to be supported?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 15:55:37 -0000

I was also looking at this again my assumption is that TIAS is what a WebRTC endpoint should generate TIAS as Philipp stated this is hinted at in the W3C spec but probably also should be specified in JSEP and an example in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-01#section-5.2.2 would also be useful.

For parsing then both TIAS and AS needs to be supported this is specified in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-14#section-5.8. 

Regards
Andy




> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Philipp
> Hancke
> Sent: 25 April 2016 10:24
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] which bandwidth modifiers need to be supported?
> 
> which bandwidth modifiers for b= lines does a client need to support?
> 
> Chrome currently supports b=AS, however the implementation is closer to
> TIAS semantically. Firefox does not implement either currently.
> 
> http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#widl-RTCRtpEncodingParameters-
> maxBitrate
> uses TIAS as a definition.
> 
> For parsing, supporting both is fine (for a while at least).
> For serialization I would prefer picking one (TIAS) to having to track
> which variant a peer supports.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb