Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Temasys supports the dual codec proposal.

We will support at least vp8 and H.264 in most of our products (BE, plugin,
SDKs) and of course more codecs where it makes sense (AVC high profile is a
good example, VP8 with temporal scalability is another).

We plan to provide support for at least VP8 and H.264 (with hardware acc
when possible i.e. iOS 8+) when porting webrtc to webkit. What will be
supported in the ports/browsers using webkit as a rendering engine (*cough*
*safari**cough*) will be up to those ports maintainers.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2014-12-09 20:11 GMT+01:00 Cavigioli, Chris <chris.cavigioli@intel.com>:
> > Paying for codecs pays for research labs to continue their research to
> > invent new things
>
> Please, don't go there. The business model of research labs is not the
> subject here, and I assume you agree that the W3C's goal is not to
> satisfy any business model.
>
> Said that, there are some "minor" examples in the world that may
> contradict what you said, such as the Linux and open source whole
> ecosystem. Anyhow, that is not the subject.
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

-- 
Alex. Gouaillard, PhD, PhD, MBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTO - Temasys Communications, S'pore / Mountain View
President - CoSMo Software, Cambridge, MA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sg.linkedin.com/agouaillard

   -