IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Thu, 27 December 2012 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF23421F88A9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:22:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09bbhMDA7Sk2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:22:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp003.apm-internet.net (smtp003.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF3621F8884 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 60356 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2012 12:21:59 -0000
X-AV-Scan: clean
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp003.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 27 Dec 2012 12:21:59 -0000
Received: from [192.67.4.33] (unknown [192.67.4.33]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D466618A0ACA; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:21:58 +0000 (GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113323681@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:21:58 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30CCEF02-8AB3-49DE-AF6D-C03B1005F9CC@phonefromhere.com>
References: <50D2CC6A.4090500@ericsson.com> <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7623356EF@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com> <50D3E3BF.7070609@mozilla.com> <50D48DD8.3050702@nostrum.com> <5BEDD27D-B359-4CD4-B01C-427E6BB1372A@standardstrack.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113323681@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus Regarding Selecting Recommended Audio Codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:22:02 -0000

On 26 Dec 2012, at 17:18, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:

> 
> On Dec 25, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> We then either have a nice big section in this present document describing the current state of the art of various networks with various codecs *OR* we have an Informational Implementor's Guide that describes the current state of the art of various networks, as well as the pitfalls of popular but hard codecs, like G.722.
> 
> Would someone be willing to summarize a list of codecs that at some people have argued strongly in favor of along with the main advantage of thawing that codec. I'm thinking of a list that looks something like
> 
> AMR-WB   Gets you interop with existing 3GPP 

Haha. As if just having the code was going to allow you to interop with existing 3gpp !
How about: 

AMR-WB   Might slightly help your interop struggles  with 3gpp - will definitely land you with a license bill and a user counting problem.

> 
> Having a list like this would be a handy quick references to discussion.

Have we agreed to have a discussion ? 
I thought this was talks about talks to overthrow an existing decision.

If we are in the mood to throw out existing decisions, I've a few I'd like to revisit .....

T.

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email