Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

Why does Hadriel care - an SBC can always change the terminology ;) 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James M. Polk
Sent: 26. lokakuuta 2011 20:57
To: Hadriel Kaplan
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

Hadriel

now that you named it, you have to fix it (or otherwise make it work) ...

;-)

James

At 12:17 PM 10/26/2011, Cullen Jennings wrote:

>With my chair hat on ...
>
>I'd like to declare we currently have consensus for Hadriel's proposal 
>that the technology should be referred to as "WebRTC" and the API as 
>the "WebRTC API". The IETF WG name is still RTCWeb, the mailing list is 
>still rtcweb@ietf.org, the IETF drafts should still have "-rtcweb-" in 
>them to indicate the WG name.
>
>Cullen <RTCWeb CoChair>
>
>
>On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
> > For the API, the consensus was it would be confusing to people if
> we weren't consistent with W3C docs.
> >
> > So I propose the following:
> >
> > WebRTC: the whole shebang
> > WebRTC API: the JS<->Browser API.
> >
> > -hadriel
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb