Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 26 October 2011 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962B921F8AA8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.729
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_BACKHAIR_27=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v+3yuT4CiHYg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F7B21F8A7E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-26-4ea84a507ca3
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 42.B4.20773.05A48AE4; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:58:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.250]) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.84]) with mapi; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:58:40 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "'James M. Polk'" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:58:39 +0200
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
Thread-Index: AcyUCKR75ts33OY/SEWRptad5hBcZwAAChsg
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233D45FF4@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <AAB480AA-8F03-4C25-8A7C-55B88D057C24@acmepacket.com> <42322A10-14A7-4600-820D-7612A1B12592@cisco.com> <3747C7CB-C039-4D15-A46C-8FDB9A47AF3A@acmepacket.com> <DD0E14D2-252F-442B-9AFC-8ECD6704794B@cisco.com> <201110261756.p9QHuke7006749@mtv-core-1.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201110261756.p9QHuke7006749@mtv-core-1.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:58:42 -0000

Why does Hadriel care - an SBC can always change the terminology ;) 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James M. Polk
Sent: 26. lokakuuta 2011 20:57
To: Hadriel Kaplan
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

Hadriel

now that you named it, you have to fix it (or otherwise make it work) ...

;-)

James

At 12:17 PM 10/26/2011, Cullen Jennings wrote:

>With my chair hat on ...
>
>I'd like to declare we currently have consensus for Hadriel's proposal 
>that the technology should be referred to as "WebRTC" and the API as 
>the "WebRTC API". The IETF WG name is still RTCWeb, the mailing list is 
>still rtcweb@ietf.org, the IETF drafts should still have "-rtcweb-" in 
>them to indicate the WG name.
>
>Cullen <RTCWeb CoChair>
>
>
>On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
> > For the API, the consensus was it would be confusing to people if
> we weren't consistent with W3C docs.
> >
> > So I propose the following:
> >
> > WebRTC: the whole shebang
> > WebRTC API: the JS<->Browser API.
> >
> > -hadriel
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb