Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-06: max-bundle policy questions

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6081A0CA3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEi1DC3f31Zl for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF6C1A0C3D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q59so2688453wes.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:51:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uIWyF8GKpVQQr+MrEwVh6Py9fuy55XuQBIS8GqIPpSA=; b=C/nEhuzRhB82/z1uZpbzPd1ovayWYMovDHNSFnTRbZgTBwFYb36GumHnHb2HAu2nje ui3FOIqmZB1Nly4fuOTAJnU1om6XS2/YC49Z8HLAalIAUBNSzvLWbk1WrUHGPs536jiM 9TdWsOzMdXyxi3RQ1l4eAxR0mi6Cff/3YVC7sjL9lOTDEYa5WO+qvX3vqWUJBnGyJ2ew 7jWpkL7Qt2ItI+AecHZ+v+L0zLhVBoaJ9LlzpWiQJ8hPl1e1cdL9U5nppftPuBgT8meL qCDF3m7z6N99fe4A/deCyY4BeWaaa76CMUz4wAxx3eSyRky5lc+5VyN9VAO3YEDioGjT 7MIQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.161.136 with SMTP id xs8mr4265613wjb.56.1393829495122; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:51:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.10.196 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:51:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-3659WdV6p11QV80qjvaXUUrTmK38tJOX8WWrg6Y220AQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1B552E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnV4fQqL6noAr1ss4-7qxSjtbSL_zvBcHxa7w-M_w-GNAQ@mail.gmail.com> <ounmuomkvyqv65mnd7mt50pp.1393269879902@email.android.com> <CABkgnnXttbpOJ5yALNB3XTo4EQPmh-vn3bV_Qmwz0+A-j8zhWw@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1B597C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-3659WdV6p11QV80qjvaXUUrTmK38tJOX8WWrg6Y220AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:51:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUR9-dWEHwyAEsYEJ1BvgBLL2f0p7MmnH+Tt9ZQJyz1Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/CA_lYruGx8ckE5PuB0wRPg07c1o
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-06: max-bundle policy questions
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:51:40 -0000

On 2 March 2014 13:45, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> We had a discussion in Seattle (IIRC) that the "first" track could be the
> first one provided to AddTrack, and I think that is simplest. (This of
> course requires the AddTrack proposal to go through.)

That's true.  But then you have to decide which is first :)  We could
assume that the order follows what is in every example ever, but
that's still an assumption.