Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC091B2BA9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.729
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezEEj8whlAG1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD30C1B2B74 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy4so2527711vcb.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1OFgA5w57K218Movowteg6NZrddjnNfqlevRvmLuseM=; b=TuPGdMHsf4DqceBFYg64x7AAFUBZtyWEoPjHHGKDeYHWuXxSXx+ehVCgnXb0ZD+r6C iki95/RNGgKVtlJrqGK/yfA3v8q26R1A5FaXZPF63xJJwQgObsbgGPxFE3jvYA3aZ/Xe BxmADUZCwpdg176Cr02A+a/ehq9DAP6CJglCPVsztduzA+XxVc4cIPsx/TsU8uB2kBJO FT2jiZDkKGSy5qr3wKJAWl2Pir91eJa5tkhLOqJ2dR0TBu9b0UYUwRViMEa99uEFdE6o o1qxFTboR9NNoI45w+WVV87gNoAC2Qvy/jHhbo3+x2qCwUZDPdYGlGMl7sXmNdI1Ls8S 6QsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=1OFgA5w57K218Movowteg6NZrddjnNfqlevRvmLuseM=; b=jKeR6U+aXBVurCrVKD4pkv7OopGUsaznwia8o3qziRBHsex6TUxo8Yd0zBNEnzq7SQ 3LrMS3AwyZHngob4d3OuS1aN0Zno0L9x8T7I0h8UVjbPADeso7r5aQkFHRUmm7JubF7r lmit2W1G9fptGKBzPjnpfCI1i16Biv399mLH9QQ48gdIA3nv90L/jjCGO0nOVktksjaX vU4ufXaluxspYRNziGik4vVQZKWp1BXA0P0HZUstTMq7o8TU4jGyDzcPuIVQhh3dsGEJ GBHD0oivkPOdTUsXXMJN0kOJ+Kje0vxCLjAKp8/hCby+Ef96Q9TxISdFWjwRdoIQHH1q MwsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWBkqbtN4RwHcEcZEqqBLy8BiP3WMXTtDIz2DUlPjZjKkvLN40TaJ6PdJ2gd5DuUKRQOl7
X-Received: by 10.220.185.132 with SMTP id co4mr1928173vcb.74.1405096455129; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.27.8 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfke27BGRQc-HhZnQRHZWJfPzYjGf+spSdn_yh-Wb87NjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegf=kLtiUKoue=ahXP4fUhLJNNd8vCaQTECQxjK5R7cjLTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv8s5-FNR-kq0C01H_Ev39cyBs5P__Pd-0cmCXDFYy-YQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPV_iVcSmi+ndDaYY6zX=F7TRoSDFqe5hzJP3-NjZ7Y1w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=CMAOwVF3=gNY9qrsTfsEwuiwvGZ_1SaS0waOUE83-Ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMPyT4y1v12O5pb7Khs2ge0pgjUugrBS0NoK8=SLOScxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3fWP0q2O58FirSYcV3Ldai4TcRoBQg7nDx4OTPc_evrA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfke27BGRQc-HhZnQRHZWJfPzYjGf+spSdn_yh-Wb87NjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:33:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-21TXrhV7mPpt2rzm6oQOCifNOphm8FqFo2-t+Nis497Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b671d1c156c7c04fded83c4"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/CJ8ff5kLh4SgaMBO9hJjG2Ivaro
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about ICE-Lite server
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:34:17 -0000

Yes, Chrome always uses aggressive nomination unless ICE Lite is used.


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

>
> On Jul 11, 2014 6:13 PM, "Justin Uberti" <juberti@google.com> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> > Chrome supports ICE lite, with regular nomination. There were a lot of
> requests for it.
>
> That is great. BTW does Chrome use aggressive nomination when the peer is
> full ICE? I did not check that.
>
> Thanks.
>