IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Thu, 29 September 2011 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA2E21F8D66 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSCPA+7wJioq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA2021F8D65 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9AE16E2; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=FS0b/uG3x0djZb eNqctFV5y5Kng=; b=n039cWcbDys5oSE/nFQfVZc+eSyCT+Ka5QmCix1rlZpdMZ 7YnBOV7MxzeTEMVu9t1iL+Rf7/TF1on+lf3cDHNoqn3+0gucNtq+XYnSvGxcg5CX 7AXw+4dQUmjDaDfj87wfvAuiyZLqRRcS4g/niqdBlgmJMDDkjEOcucn0Xl3ZY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=C2fXUYTgAeZ5SFRFWfBtfg uD6cJ+Uh127ivBxWi/xXjhZHGc073z86YoC1m2lPMvvb6TNzJE6O3i7OGE9DICTb IpZtKjODtgs/Z+YIBnQfQJMKDclmXU9X1/cfdgCRlRKe4XBlEX4IllIR+7c//pK6 POWxBvrcTLvryYheDdo44=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C06D7F8; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3C73507E25; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pW5jlxxrRtJC; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:26:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [198.202.199.254]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A51953507E20; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:26:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E84F06B.7020705@skype.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:25:47 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com> <4E80984A.903@skype.net> <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com> <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net> <CAD5OKxvUOadaU0dnB7-Ho9cZ92VY+4Owuhj7oKPCx9Jy1iwT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <C2DF2C51-B3F7-443D-A047-7E6FB03E6D20@phonefromhere.com> <CAOJ7v-3AJJcdrCKcH4AJmv_016sZtcOPOo8yCv3Va65eJogAkQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C72381-DC23-4A6A-944C-B418791876B0@cisco.com> <CALiegf=nG+KXto9CXfn64CQSp3P5Lfm+S8c0xnA187Fhz=fcrQ@mail.gmail.com> <05B54E0C-B867-4D7F-825D-2E008E69B07F@acmepacket.com>
In-Reply-To: <05B54E0C-B867-4D7F-825D-2E008E69B07F@acmepacket.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:24:07 -0000

On 9/29/2011 2:59 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> ICE-Lite is easier for gateway-type devices, but it's still got to do the SHA-1 calc per STUN connectivity-check response packet, which is painful from a performance/scale perspective (and thus cost).

Ridiculous. We're not talking something like one SHA-1 HMAC per packet 
received... this is one SHA-1 per connectivity test. That's one or two 
packets *per call*. No way that increases the cost/complexity of any 
possible device that might be terminating or transcoding media.

Matthew Kaufman

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status