[rtcweb] Traffic on the list (Re: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC))

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 14 November 2011 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F252E21F8AFF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGfYWn3iU5h2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235221F8446 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E4B39E0CD; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:23:07 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z+PMQZvdPgWc; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:23:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [130.129.22.244] (dhcp-16f4.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.22.244]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFBD539E074; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:23:05 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EC0EC06.7020701@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:23:02 +0800
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIEJheiBDYXN0aWxsbw==?= <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CALiegfkVNVAs_MyU_-4koA4zRwSn1-FwLjY9g_oZVkhi9rSK5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvQYVKOZF88WLCiRseg-qXQdOpKeDU_t9b-yA2GcDBT-w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOiPxz_swdaG6Aqoch1WAUtjNh4eOQy1QObCDXT_B8azg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtp+LQBRCHgbWdJyrSRcpNQ82i64TJgGtGPrE7+GKcEog@mail.gmail.com> <4EBC3475.90706@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxu_-+ZRsqpUBkFSj=tYtOKG0pK3JoQTZHwQGMuBCnp0Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuaWJ3SBv+0gac6EQy6-Lsb-LS_SBXk5FqObKy4mN6wNg@mail.gmail.com> <CCF4FC92-D5AA-43C8-A0B2-8041C9B8E1BD@edvina.net> <CAD5OKxs-pWwDBjwAu=mQVWRZa4H_YPpzQ31=0qxUUj-pJOErcg@mail.gmail.com> <A2DFC694-DBDF-4DB4-8DE0-DD638C7AF2BE@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkU1qhLmhY9L373pF7j9zwHipFfu4mAuY49RDTNL7V5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <C11CACFE-FE5A-43F2-8B61-6ABC9965B7FC@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkehnLmWuqBPMRki=tJDTHmJ0e6M3RGX-mDBJNzcAA_DQ@mail.gmail.com> <FCFB9735-FB48-45C1-9ADF-CA6DBE5299B1@acmepacket.com> <CALiegfkstuyuRJWEvsU7EtHE5V41zavdrN0OZ1OSWtv022P16Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkstuyuRJWEvsU7EtHE5V41zavdrN0OZ1OSWtv022P16Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: [rtcweb] Traffic on the list (Re: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC))
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:23:10 -0000

On 11/14/2011 05:53 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
> My concern is that 75% of the traffic in this maillist is about making
> WebRTC capable to accomplish with SIP/PSTN requirements. And that is
> not so bad, but what is really bad is that there is no more.

Inaki,

out of the last 903 messages on the list, 151 of them (approximately 1 
of 6) were written by you.
Many, many of your messages are about SIP.
Perhaps if you did not talk so much about SIP, there would be more room 
for the "other stuff" that you miss so much?

                         Harald