Re: [rtcweb] AVPF [was: Encryption mandate (and offer/answer)]

Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> Sat, 10 September 2011 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <dzonatas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF2821F84C9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.915
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.316, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVY38SdR8ubg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A14F21F84B8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so15046701pzk.18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EEc1BVXAAZ508CUUhtsRG9RPuP/ItJYQVRLPeQ04UoU=; b=aGY2sOEdhzozid6vtgEaxeaqoJq5inKkHP/RkyaTSKJyCrnELNBSPxaUBDHC/ny2LF L+nB/21Jp4UUOCkvarxx839ZbKAgD4itRBHDIXTJBla/3WaYijYterEAviw37sN6tDa0 g7mKwmqk4cLMoHCMw75A9NYcC/kVOwpu0d1Lo=
Received: by 10.68.1.104 with SMTP id 8mr1765214pbl.91.1315678707533; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (adsl-70-133-70-225.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net. [70.133.70.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm29145382pbr.4.2011.09.10.11.18.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E6BAA68.7020001@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:20:24 -0700
From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110505 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0B00FDB08B@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <033458F56EC2A64E8D2D7B759FA3E7E7020E64DC@sonusmail04.sonusnet.com> <E4EC1B17-0CC4-4F79-96DD-84E589FCC4F0@edvina.net> <4E67C3F7.7020304@jesup.org> <BE60FA11-8FFF-48E5-9F83-4D84A7FBE2BE@vidyo.com> <4E67F003.6000108@jesup.org> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233E8554C@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <C3759687E4991243A1A0BD44EAC8230339CA68F054@BE235.mail.lan> <CAOJ7v-2u0UuNXh7bzmZFwiSucbsh=Ps=C3ZM5M3cJrXRmZgODA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKhHsXHXCkNdjtpxCSCk+ABbtxY15GEgouE6X6-sn-LqhnidQw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOdP6cAqBoiSV-Vdv1_EK3DfgnMamT3t3ccjDOMfELfBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKhHsXFdU1ZaKQF8hbsOxwTS-_RfmFqQhgzGe=K4mRp+wz+_nQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtCMXzWLg40wV3teyh0TdiD1Xv4taW+BSguoDpAE46oJA@mail.gmail.com> <1541FDA8-C3F6-4D24-BEC4-60EDACB6B582@edvina.net> <CAD5OKxsuONT_-ZWS43BX7H8dkGscz2aM62m0uDyJauVTaUMC4g@mail.gmail.com> <4E6B8ED1.6040601@skype.net> <4E6B9171.1010308@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6B9171.1010308@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] AVPF [was: Encryption mandate (and offer/answer)]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:16:30 -0000

On 09/10/2011 09:33 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> On 09/10/2011 09:22 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>>
>> Even if we need plain RTP, that isn't an argument for SDES-keyed SRTP.
>>
>
> SRTP appears useful for subscriptions.
>

Yes, I'm thinking that this WG can say JS *needs* subscriptions to 
virtual dirvers (or at least ABI drivers), and that JS works on RFC.

Is that a bend?

-- 
--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant