Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: Aboutdefining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 22 September 2011 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC8811E808D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqhzQ+u95Mgy for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B3F11E8083 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11so914548vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.213.132 with SMTP id gw4mr677680vcb.52.1316718987268; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.94.200 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0F58@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
References: <CALiegfnOCxyTo9ffQ272+ncdu5UdgrtDT-dn10BWGTZMEjZoCg@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0C0A@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <05CAC192-E462-421F-B1E5-B78DC8F60306@ag-projects.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0C93@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <16880306-5B3A-4EFD-ADE4-1201138D9182@acmepacket.com> <8584590C8D7DD141AA96D01920FC6C698C896B71@gbplmail03.genband.com> <CA+9kkMAwnnKKO5+q6ey4Z0QNxax1QF21vVtw8FNsHy_rmfenjQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E76E078.5020708@jesup.org> <8548CBBD-4E12-48F3-BC59-341FF45EF22F@acmepacket.com> <4E77495E.4000409@jesup.org> <CALiegfkTdCAeEdZbXP1Y9L6i4Anjrgf1CG6ZNj35WGoHL3p_Ew@mail.gmail.com> <4E774F92.4040405@jesup.org> <8ECCEE59-E855-4EA9-92B9-543D1585B1F0@ag-projects.com> <4E778F1F.9090105@jesup.org> <CEA0AC9E-6387-4066-95DC-0D70302E80A7@ag-projects.com> <4E77C3EC.9060801@jesup.org> <CAD5OKxtciYxaVpb7b3G9yMg1A97b9dkjkOpppZcSRzS5SAO3+A@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0DD8@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <C55E752E-18FD-402C-A7DE-1627813B3F6D@acmepacket.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0F58@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:16:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=RT-5vWS016VgV-UFPMirvkjYFqwLs3M2dFz=C-CxsNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: Aboutdefining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:13:57 -0000

2011/9/22 Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>;:
> The disadvantage with JS is that each server has to provide its
> own instance of JS library.

And that's the magic of the WWW world: the fact that each provider is
free to provide exactly what it needs. That leads to the success of
the WWW and allows fast innovation.


> It may be possible to have plugin instead of
> JS but it will defeat the purpose of RTCWeb charter.

A plugin like Flash, Java or ActiveX? sure we want that?



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>;