IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for RTCWeb Interim May 19-20, 2014

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Fri, 09 May 2014 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BD41A006E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8sMcVoGibMUL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142001A0053 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u57so4304330wes.18 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rBv1QTW9xmJfywCgi07KLeMXje8xoocDrLGRin252kY=; b=XrTYjUqAsQSjDsOryO2EdcW6SH8EJYGByZxNHv9tbWVcAJTwkvZGFIFSTCT+kJ4mmD DOncwcFWYtE/JKdXXYF+xz36KLN0ccdMH8XD64Yed2CaKpupktUxmTrIxHUZo8oWoDzE kAd+MP14PY8WxcRuMgv/KyBlesKJ4QTus0GxM/dBJRltACiFnPDxkcY8Vmx7paVmkBEC IVJ6cazw8SCIgThnkEXBdJDaWvQX8rxxPipFY46xsFTb8RkQfbJ6bADJneI0Rz5l3fjm ZL0bqIHmoTEGV1wwqKivUMXtEGfVpy1coma9L7jaZh4KLQdV3gaSiQTK6x7sKUsGqDg9 dcgw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.81.36 with SMTP id w4mr4462690wix.36.1399660807506; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.93.68 with HTTP; Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C2C90B6B-A2C0-4EE4-ACCF-AFF34AD88714@iii.ca>
References: <DC7F85E4-B6AD-4874-9E11-FC30809DAD96@iii.ca> <CAHBDyN6=f0LntDt+3hBrcMafYmbr9nVF5vgteVf0G-JCERtmEA@mail.gmail.com> <00B57139-F6A6-48B4-969D-A90EAF638062@iii.ca> <CAHBDyN713=3xajzdzgGox--gj3+gvy2TLKZjucfb1gYL35_hjg@mail.gmail.com> <682CE2BB-F20A-4A87-A4FC-B686CD581743@iii.ca> <CAHBDyN7BOr5bcmf2J3ooooPu-UW+oL-rsUy9XBT76dMeWuZ2PA@mail.gmail.com> <C2C90B6B-A2C0-4EE4-ACCF-AFF34AD88714@iii.ca>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 13:40:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN4LE91dwtj2aJPPMHVP8nJdmVdD3yKzVPpvETA97DTWkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec550ac243cd06704f8fbed55"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/DPLkN9sWS6Pb0VVBHwku0QKCWsE
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for RTCWeb Interim May 19-20, 2014
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 18:40:14 -0000

Well, the answer to my question initially was that the remote participation
was going to depend upon who would be attending, so it wasn't clear to me
there was any original intent to support remote participation.  I've
chatted with Ted and I'm satisfied that you guys will do the best you can
based upon the location where you are meeting.

Thanks,
Mary.


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

>
> On May 9, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It certainly would have been nice to know when the meeting was being
> organized that there were no plans for remote participation nor recording.
>
> Mary that is really warping what I said out of context.  We will do the
> best that we can - and like most IETF interim meetings, including the CLUE
> ones, that will almost certainly be less than ideal.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email