Re: [rtcweb] How to multiplex between peers

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 17 October 2011 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4F121F8B43 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.329, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QhEBDbZA9Yc9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1323E21F8B3F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so4206701gyh.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.38.74 with SMTP id e10mr12447559pbk.78.1318888804191; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z3sm206048pbu.7.2011.10.17.15.00.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so7984250pzk.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.8.233 with SMTP id u9mr12123pba.30.1318888802028; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.47.40 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBCORykSxx5v0ZsyKOOLNVweREPajqJjM83DifJv8GE1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA4CDFF2.1C5A3%henry.sinnreich@gmail.com> <4E27EE6E.30600@alvestrand.no> <CAAPAK-50B74tmrvZ+75aYsiwxfvv41akCXOtnrNOdL6jimazGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBCORykSxx5v0ZsyKOOLNVweREPajqJjM83DifJv8GE1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:00:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxubdU10Wwr0_hwBRH+JYBdJhKyfNeJJNivjuGwDnqpRtQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5215a598b0d0f04af85bab8
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] How to multiplex between peers
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:00:06 -0000

In case you did not notice, Dzonatas Sol is a bot. I would suggest just spam
filtering it.
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Dzonatas,
>
> Your emails to the group have become less and less on point over time.
> Please send email to the group only when you have substantive comments on
> the work going on.  If you do not, the chairs may have to consider
> suspending your right to post.
>
> regards,
>
> Ted Hardie
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>; wrote:
>
>> I got this Quantum Vibe link from an /. ad: http://shar.es/bqNgs<http://t.co/RprNtB3k>
>>
>> I think that be a link-in-a-link, a meta-link, or a canonical multiplexer
>> in pix#4; it applies to B2B and the server-to-server paradigm is not
>> obvious.
>>
>> ...anymore. ;)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/21/11 02:41, Henry Sinnreich wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>  If anything this is an argument for ignoring RTP and RTCP and doing
>>>>> something entirely new that is actually appropriate for what we're
>>>>> trying to build, not living with crap just because there's an RFC for
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>> Not to forget disposing of ancient SDP as well.
>>>> Use standard metadata instead, since it is equally usable for all apps,
>>>> not
>>>> only for RTC apps.
>>>>
>>> Henry, which standard?
>>> http://www.xkcd.com/927/ applies to metadata too, I think.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>