Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal

Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> Mon, 10 November 2014 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew@matthew.at>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E85E1ACF58 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:41:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jMPDH5bktu9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eeph.com (mail.eeph.com [IPv6:2001:470:826a:d2::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD4C1ACF54 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.190.46.26] (unknown [166.170.38.35]) (Authenticated sender: matthew@matthew.at) by mail.eeph.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 075CE4644FA; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:41:08 -0800 (PST)
References: <54601E19.8080203@nostrum.com> <CALiegf=2taTKeWj2cojy0tZsTpM5WY9YyPOzNtCz3ob_3eq=1g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=2taTKeWj2cojy0tZsTpM5WY9YyPOzNtCz3ob_3eq=1g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7A2D65C-D6D9-430F-A12B-68AE4FBBFF01@matthew.at>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:41:06 -0800
To: =?utf-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Di4lyfOxYwxk2lU0QgalxKG8TUI
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] MTI Video Codec: a novel proposal
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:41:09 -0000

Do you believe that making a codec mandatory in an IETF spec will force the corporate lawyers at the browser vendors to drop their objections to that codec?

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

> On Nov 10, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>; wrote:
> 
> 2014-11-10 3:08 GMT+01:00 Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>;:
>> 1. WebRTC User Agents MUST implement both VP8 and H.264.
> 
> If "WebRTC User Agent" means web browser (and I think so), I am in
> favour of non mandating web browsers to implement non-free&open
> codecs.
> 
> This is, a MTI codec must be open, free, and free of royalty/licensing stuff.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb