IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan

"Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Fri, 13 September 2013 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AA221E80F1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61uqWpiwbI9C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0203.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.203]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB93B21E80DD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY2PR03CA035.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.234.156) by BY2PR03MB141.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.242.35.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.745.25; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:43:12 +0000
Received: from BN1BFFO11FD022.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::143) by BY2PR03CA035.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2c2c::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:43:12 +0000
Received: from mail.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BN1BFFO11FD022.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.53.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.755.13 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:43:11 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.222]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.03.0136.001; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:42:45 +0000
From: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
Thread-Index: AQHOsKGn1VGs8vczk0uUtIwsFTEk4JnD6iaAgAAcbgCAAAr+bg==
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:42:44 +0000
Message-ID: <01D307B1-60B9-4580-8A40-8B755BFB5586@skype.net>
References: <CA+9kkMAvdtq_gufKmDNCNCL+kKcxyi0MGUoVHetd9_DzbEdEnA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfk1rArkDGx6_3NaiKuSVe7udcHSBrotg51ctH-dc2PpsA@mail.gmail.com>, <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1166A9750@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1166A9750@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(24454002)(189002)(199002)(51704005)(377454003)(51856001)(79102001)(56816003)(56776001)(83072001)(59766001)(77982001)(54316002)(19580395003)(83322001)(19580405001)(53806001)(77096001)(76482001)(54356001)(44976005)(6806004)(76796001)(81686001)(15975445006)(80022001)(76786001)(36756003)(50466002)(33656001)(81816001)(82746002)(65816001)(69226001)(80976001)(23756003)(74706001)(74876001)(47776003)(47736001)(20776003)(46102001)(63696002)(81542001)(74662001)(31966008)(49866001)(47976001)(50986001)(4396001)(81342001)(74366001)(47446002)(74502001)(83716001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB141; H:mail.microsoft.com; CLIP:131.107.125.37; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-O365ENT-EOP-Header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0968D37274
X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-9e79206f-3253-44e7-9aa6-8e1280886b67.skype.net
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:43:20 -0000

The W3C was the right venue for the video tag codec discussion, just like it is for this video codec discussion.

I'll note that the chairs have repeatedly pointed out that the scope is explicitly "browsers"

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:05 PM, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> That topic was discussed between W3C and IETF when forming the two WG and very clear decisions was made that the W3C would not make that decision. Part of the reasons had to do with the history of a very similar argument at W3C around the video tag. 
> 
> On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> 
>> Do not take me wrong, but IMHO this decision should be taken by the W3C WebRTC group.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status