IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 26 February 2013 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6726221F87CC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:54:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ObagQOjFjJI for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE2F21F8793 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:54:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1918; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1361904853; x=1363114453; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=1CsRHFlDnPa9n7QZKsFbU2GwQyUJSgufVVn+hfFT+/g=; b=Te9ILYhPhsRNywwxeEVKEnz6DQ79FtD+8Kg5CIT1NSOoPWgA5XOWerCa zQjzDhAITOd0pvR2iPhn8zgUgBIUazIJ+ZLjPFRISlnglGFz9INoHWkrM kOhWTbO4ivNPwK5gmgTeGJUoDopqydu2rzATarUGCLAeUp2dUcz8nChk+ Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFABYELVGtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABFwWt/FnOCHwEBAQMBAQEBNzQLBQcEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcnCxQJCAIEDgUIiAUFAQcFrhKBZpAKjmECMQcGgllhA5deijaFFIMIcQGBNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,742,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="181426508"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2013 18:54:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1QIsDqg013259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:54:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.155]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:54:12 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
Thread-Topic: Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
Thread-Index: AQHOFExGxLgqgTDk7Uq8NoYnsLB7sZiMelTQgABm/IA=
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:54:12 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113404D85@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113404C31@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484161F1E25@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484161F1E25@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.68.20.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <48360E7C62254543BB1EC22B23399EDD@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:54:14 -0000

sorry - I put the wrong draft name, it got updated to a -01 

better link at 

http://bit.ly/13fOrrZ


On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:

> Where is said draft? Hard to know if this would be time well spent if the draft isn't available. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-00 returns 404
> 
> Matthew Kaufman
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:08 AM
> To: <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> Subject: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
> 
> 
> I would like 25 minutes for presentation of information key to draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti that is not interrupted and 15 minutes for Q/A for the work. 
> 
> We have spent many hours of meeting time discussing the way we were going to make a decision around codecs and information needed, but we have not yet spent time discussing the actually information to make the decision. This draft addressees several very key issues, including the actually quality comparison of VP8 and H.264. I think that spending any less time than this would result in a situation where the WG was not making an decisions with the information available. Similarly, other  people that have written other drafts with similar or different views also need to speak up about how much time they need and that we make sure everyone has time to explain the key information, people have time to ask questions about it, and we can make an informed decisions instead of having to discuss the video codecs at many future meetings. 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email