Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for the upcoming meeting

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> Tue, 21 October 2014 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6C01A6F7F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5x6LvS8p4TK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.unify.com (mx12.unify.com [62.134.46.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D86B1A6F45 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.234]) by mx12.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id 7461623F049B; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:32:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.241]) by MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.234]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:32:24 +0200
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>, "Cullen Jenning (work)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Agenda for the upcoming meeting
Thread-Index: AQHP6WQkBv1/hIPnb0eX/BgOoxserpw4SxAAgAFk34D//5eAAIABWkiA
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:32:23 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E5CE58C@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <CA+9kkMBQobeA_6aiMZffA6hHNkySK+CZptJU0XYzDyxGF4xE2A@mail.gmail.com> <54442F52.3090608@andyet.net> <3A26E75E-BEF0-4D71-9372-01CE9D199E3D@cisco.com> <CAPvvaa+XZ+nxB15j9aNge-ZYo1R0rz1kKR+beqgs5GUoHHVoJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPvvaa+XZ+nxB15j9aNge-ZYo1R0rz1kKR+beqgs5GUoHHVoJA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/E-eMyum1nk-_gSyZE0O1DXLQj1Y
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for the upcoming meeting
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:32:26 -0000


On: 20 October 2014 20:42 Emil Ivov Wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2014 8:55 PM, "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So lets be clear here.
> 
> Good idea!
> 
> > Every time we checked, there has been consensus that we need an MTI
> codec.
> > So right now this work is sort of blocked on that
> 
> So clearly, what work is blocked on that exactly?
> 

The only thing that seems to be blocked is the MTI Codec decision and here I think we need to accept that no decision is better than a wrong decision or a decision that divides the community. 

Therefore I suggest we continue to ignore the issue and move on.

Andy