Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 21:36 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03E71ADED9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkaGwnT3NIRw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4141ADF38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e14so12932127iej.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a74KHRtXK75FJfcDgXFX9HJKkSJfw/K2t6VbT/LvzNo=; b=Bfr9qBMqnpCZ/rnJUQQUShpw9dpczFpjZ1P30dA6z2saDt/fUuf71u/oPa9+kcXKZO 3hSOcXCGnSYxQZuvfHDB7/NgLk58gYmpZHgdzoahtnIKsfoeS0VVse9I2hnq54K4b9Xt gpJhBMvmFkNXtA91BbUeRXP5ICZorILrXfhtnQwOKFaSzOmvyKnJVAl+cLXDmi2KgzGu SDj823/aSzbKm+Abq1xtuuuYfVojdW0GRq23avQosWYxcBnyQ13vqPY0upauTBAe8kIP HflFnNq4SUZ2ZQzKprEOXfrSkqBx6HtOdBxHcjV7PIfmmoIZ01Few5+PXV5hw3Dp8dC0 8dgQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.61.205 with SMTP id s13mr23678101igr.29.1385588186005; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.104.130 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548AE06C@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
References: <5295B358.1040302@ericsson.com> <5295DA58.60504@jitsi.org> <5295E663.4020607@ericsson.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548ADD3C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548AE06C@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBe_ezjSQYq7fQWZJAy=eNpcUPrvHtWkGCmA3whxSGf5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Gaelle Martin-Cocher <gmartincocher@blackberry.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd7679aa1c62504ec2f6362"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:36:30 -0000
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher < gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote: > If we proceed with the vote, I would like to see the following choice: > All entities must support H263. > > Thanks > Gaëlle > > I've updated the wiki to include this as choice 13. If you have a reference that we could use that specifies version, annexes, or any other additional detail, we can include a pointer. Ted > > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gaelle > Martin-Cocher > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:29 AM > To: Magnus Westerlund; Emil Ivov > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection > alternatives > > Dear All, > > Sorry for this late message, I was not available this past week. > > It has been mentioned by a few of us that the risks on VP8 that some can't > leave with, can be mitigated when VP8 becomes an ISO standard (via MPEG). > VP8 has a chance to become an MPEG deliverable in January. I believe that > could make a few of us more comfortable with supporting/mandating both H264 > and VP8 and could change the consensus reaching process. > > Can we give VP8 that chance before forcing a vote? > > Thanks > Sincerely, > Gaëlle > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus > Westerlund > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:33 AM > To: Emil Ivov > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection > alternatives > > On 2013-11-27 12:41, Emil Ivov wrote: > > Just to confirm, this is NOT the last day of discussion on whether a > > vote is the right way to do this at all, right? > > No, but tomorrow a week will have passed since we chairs sent out the > proposal and solicited feedback on the proposal. > > > > > That sounds like it would still be an open question for step two here: > > > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html > > As we stated in this message, after the week we chairs would update the > process proposal if we considered it necessary. I believe there are some > clarifications that needs to be done, including the voter eligibility. > > After that the stated plan was to hold a consensus call in the WG to use > the proposed process. > > Cheers > > Magnus Westerlund > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >
- [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec … Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Paul Giralt
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] Adding additional text to to all options Frode Kileng
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Co… Gaelle Martin-Cocher
- [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process for t… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… SM
- Re: [rtcweb] Why voting is not a viable process f… cowwoc