Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher <
gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote:

> If we proceed with the vote, I would like to see the following choice:
> All entities must support H263.
>
> Thanks
> Gaëlle
>
>
I've updated the wiki to include this as choice 13.  If you have a
reference that we could use that specifies version, annexes, or any other
additional detail, we can include a pointer.

Ted


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gaelle
> Martin-Cocher
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:29 AM
> To: Magnus Westerlund; Emil Ivov
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> alternatives
>
> Dear All,
>
> Sorry for this late message, I was not available this past week.
>
> It has been mentioned by a few of us that the risks on VP8 that some can't
> leave with, can be mitigated when VP8 becomes an ISO standard (via MPEG).
> VP8 has a chance to become an MPEG deliverable in January. I believe that
> could make a few of us more comfortable with supporting/mandating both H264
> and VP8 and could change the consensus reaching process.
>
> Can we give VP8 that chance before forcing a vote?
>
> Thanks
> Sincerely,
> Gaëlle
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus
> Westerlund
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:33 AM
> To: Emil Ivov
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> alternatives
>
> On 2013-11-27 12:41, Emil Ivov wrote:
> > Just to confirm, this is NOT the last day of discussion on whether a
> > vote is the right way to do this at all, right?
>
> No, but tomorrow a week will have passed since we chairs sent out the
> proposal and solicited feedback on the proposal.
>
> >
> > That sounds like it would still be an open question for step two here:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html
>
> As we stated in this message, after the week we chairs would update the
> process proposal if we considered it necessary. I believe there are some
> clarifications that needs to be done, including the voter eligibility.
>
> After that the stated plan was to hold a consensus call in the WG to use
> the proposed process.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>