IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1EB21F9E70 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ov-pdj5g5eVL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C40D21F9EC8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id as1so4666193iec.35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Lsy1CS5B3ch3/oNRr8mlVf1WbxnTDggHp8/1DAkACLg=; b=CVzxiqVfhVXioISZU6ZyXXY4ZYQWp+DxnlG0ILCRvxNsDbjCCsM7IWZCv9LONDP6B/ fkkf20GbDdPYLcvJ7HUvdk4TCOViP/0a1w7/jluCVDhZeWaKkgz7or58YCqWn4I9uiDL FH9gxG+GA0KxnBVQkhvElqBPTo0mlDYFRiVvGIgdKwIGZhVf9tb70GEmxkBmh4mColDD FW3+hP4C7iwKi4RvD2rL+xQR1JzvUgM7US/443ztGu9hbvwuVnNvC651UHBwUYhpdtUq /7SZ0zgEqtc813qDIhUVCwc19eVUelQlQCyAYwmwljDF0fYU2xqk/UCvEdxov6lxOIPf pmJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lsy1CS5B3ch3/oNRr8mlVf1WbxnTDggHp8/1DAkACLg=; b=UxGDNJYDfEgwyL0TvzKmvx5JZpGpU1QxZozPeljJWJFphhBa8fIAyp63ziXz9GS6EB 2J8sGRPZaTVttWaY6QaEDzpd0v0eBsoWizvUdiYb/4PsjYD/JwAcVATITeiF9MSjqN3k suJ4wkp3a4rwWtFOl7j1j/N2Zq6orlHeZUwFOqsW1stQiVW4Py4Nlh/SQ+NucGfx43Pn uy9z26XgGS/Nu49D3HST9FJgTPpJ09YQ5WcoOuvu0cI+HEnwUPI6tYRX/H6nT36jI0zx 6Ex4muYqFgaZOnv4RpHfK9svjZdjKFBPZUSKzsT9qJidmVyD5NXDvX9K1Ghpqf47weC+ KfnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl933u8qpVYms9F9DLQUZXDkis4QN5YOv7NFN19+hIklFfC+9rM9K5QfwNyM7+T8eDDSf+Tja2nOgusCk7D/PeoWFGtlnFMB20dTXmLoIrCJzCOPU41kcJKCuksB808vpZk3wVBTfvOu6R231w/D8fpaZiuPo5h9346zhyZax2yNRTF6lBEsXyyFubhyx0Xo1A/UjLl
X-Received: by 10.50.103.6 with SMTP id fs6mr3408340igb.16.1380305086124; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.12.104 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C4ADF2D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:04:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1gEdtWMo2zyw0TTm3mPtmT-SHZ3TuVbuhHOuLYWioMPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e0abb57735f04e7615282"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Unified Plan: 'bundle-only' documentation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:05:09 -0000

I think that the BUNDLE draft is the right place for this.


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> On the MMUSIC list I have suggested updated SDP Offer/Answer text for
> BUNDLE.
>
>
>
> Part of that text is the definition, and usage, of the SDP 'bundle-only'
> attribute.
>
>
>
> However, eventhough I personally think it fits well there (and I believe
> Adam had the same opinion, when I talked with him off-line in Berlin),
> afaik there has never been any formal WG agreement that the 'bundle-only'
> attribute will be defined in the BUNDLE draft.
>
>
>
> So, without going into the details (there are some issues, and if you are
> interested there are mail threads on the MMUSIC list dealing with those) do
> people have any issues with defining the SDP 'bundle-only' attribute, and
> the usage of it, in BUNDLE?
>
>
>
> If not, can we make a WG decision on the matter?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email