Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 21 November 2013 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FACF1AE204 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:05:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wOsmgT4K1Eua for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB98C1AE135 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc-vpn3-1087.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 503EF50A87; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:04:58 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <528A4408.50105@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:05:33 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <46A95E42-F733-490E-B72D-5D37F389ADDE@iii.ca>
References: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com> <528A0BD8.1070409@ericsson.com> <528A4408.50105@bbs.darktech.org>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:05:07 -0000

On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:44 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>; wrote:

> Does the WG commit to providing reference implementations 

IETF process does not require the WG to provide any implementations at all - I do not think the WG is committing to provide implementations of anything. Of course individuals or companies might but not the IETF. 

Cullen (as one of the chairs) …