Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet?
"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 17:00 UTC
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A3C21F8575 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5HcvGHbYwfoH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98CD21F855E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,341,1344236400"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="683816670"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2012 10:00:05 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.241]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q7UH04Pm002276; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.212]) by vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:00:04 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com" <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet?
Thread-Index: Ac2Gr8HzJ/6oA0BvSY28PJ4c6WjX7AAW88CA
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:00:09 +0000
Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E9067F38C4@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
References: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB76229C693@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB76229C693@008-AM1MPN1-041.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C4486F33-F483-4388-A545-93459B49E956"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:00:07 -0000
On Aug 30, 2012, at 15:14, Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote: > Are there any tests that actually compare different codecs, say Opus vs. G.722 vs. AMR-WB, in typical Internet use, meaning some loss and jitter? ... > But since people are arguing that Opus is an "Internet codec", it would be actually nice to see some results in this sense. +1 Lars
- [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Koen Vos
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Koen Vos
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus vs AMR-WB for packet loss Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus over the Internet? Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus vs AMR-WB for packet loss Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Opus vs AMR-WB for packet loss Stefan Hacker