Re: [rtcweb] Summary of draft-sipdoc-rtcweb-open-wire-protocol-00 (Open In-The-Wire Protocol for RTC-Web)

[Saul Ibarra Corretge <[e-mail]>]

On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:

> WG,
> 
> I have gone over the discussion in this thread and the "Does ROAP
> mandate the on-the-wire format?" thread.
> 
> From the postings in these threads I think my summary of this would be:
> 
> There was strong agreement on the need for freedom in the used signaling
> protocol and its transport between the web-app and the servers and other
> web-app instances. This can be proprietary or a standardized protocol
> and is only up to the application what suits its needs.
> 
> It is also not required to send ROAP messages end-to-end although that
> is intended to be possible.
> 
> As a WG chair, I don't see any need to adopt
> draft-sipdoc-rtcweb-open-wire-protocol-00 as a WG document. I think the
> first agreements can most easily be documented in Overview document.
> 

+1.

> Does the WG participants think it is necessary to include this in the
> use case and requirements document?
> 

I think it would be good, given all the confusion that some terms created at some point.


Cheers,

-- 
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects