Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264

[cowwoc <[e-mail]>]

     I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not...

     In any case, I had a question regarding BlackBerry 10. Are you 
implying that every BlackBerry 10 phone includes an API for real-time 
encoding/decoding of H.264 video streams? If so, which API is it? I took 
a quick look but couldn't find it.

Thanksm
Gili

On 04/11/2013 9:52 PM, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
> I think you meant *every* phone, tablet, laptop, desktop, set-top, 
> camera...
>
>
> On 11/2/13, 7:41 PM, Kaiduan Xie <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
> Every BlackBerry 10 phone has H.264 hardware encoder/decoder.
>
> /Kaiduan
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Eric Rescorla <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>     On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Gili <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>         Martin,
>
>             I fully understand why Firefox would be happy but as
>         someone who plan to integrate WebRTC into a non-browser
>         application, especially on iOS, Cisco's solution simply does
>         not work. I appreciate their contribution, but again, it
>         simply doesn't help my use-case.
>
>
>     I haven't seen  you explain how your use case is different from
>     that of
>     a browser. Could you please do so?
>
>     -Ekr
>
>         Gili
>
>
>         On 11/2/2013 11:02 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>             On 2 November 2013 07:37, cowwoc <[e-mail]
>             <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>                      I can't think of a single platform that supports
>                 real-time H.264
>                 encoding/decoding natively today.
>
>             That's a very strange way to put the question.
>
>             Let me put another spin on it, and please excuse the
>             example...
>
>             Skype runs on more platforms than you might think.  Those
>             platforms
>             can all support H.264 to the extent that Skype requires.
>
>             Cisco's generous offer opens almost the same capability to
>             anyone,
>             with the caveat that some platforms currently remain
>             closed.  Of
>             course, you could let your ideals get in the way of
>             progress.  Me, I'm
>             a pragmatist.  This gift represents a great opportunity
>             for people who
>             actually care about the practical outcomes.
>
>             There's been a lot of mouth-gazing of gift horses on this
>             list of
>             late.  I sure hope that this isn't representative of the real
>             sentiment of the community.  I'd like to think that people
>             are better
>             than that.
>
>             (BTW, I understand and respect Harald's position.  From
>             where he sits,
>             I'm sure that his conclusion makes perfect sense.)
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         rtcweb mailing list
>         [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rtcweb mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb