Re: [rtcweb] About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)

Henry Sinnreich <henry.sinnreich@gmail.com> Thu, 15 September 2011 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <henry.sinnreich@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D607311E8088 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GsN-88tkfkC2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f42.google.com (mail-gw0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570CE11E807F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so3531105gwb.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ia4BWxwszsYmTp3ohF6fbRPEGOwZB1PNYEUaIcwodiE=; b=cW5rDXpFbTc4+5qtWPxsh52fxGziO5BMMSWk0/j5fv9phMiacZdttHI3lXYLl3mICH TdygqVUSWBGKYatZ5RVw3AxIm9dTB9BrFZbx198aT+zUHGwGt43bnrRCBoJFKl1O2XjN 7EtjKlZdIfRpT3n/rDPPazYZiTOtyOEJ9gDa0=
Received: by 10.236.177.72 with SMTP id c48mr10022395yhm.79.1316121655995; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.15.2] (cpe-76-184-249-163.tx.res.rr.com. [76.184.249.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z24sm5277542yhj.5.2011.09.15.14.20.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:20:50 -0500
From: Henry Sinnreich <henry.sinnreich@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?B?SfFha2k=?= Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Message-ID: <CA97D662.1D8EA%henry.sinnreich@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)
Thread-Index: Acxz7VeJHV0yHktK0kiiDaqPs7bydA==
In-Reply-To: <20110915140248.4cc17977@lminiero-acer>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:18:44 -0000

+1

Thanks, Henry


On 9/15/11 7:02 AM, "Lorenzo Miniero" <lorenzo@meetecho.com>; wrote:

> Il giorno Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:52:38 +0200
> Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>; ha scritto:
> 
>> 2011/9/15 Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>;:
>>> Are we saying that SDP is so impossible to parse that the only way
>>> to do it is with a pre-existing native library ?!? If not I think
>>> we can do that transformation (when needed) in JavaScript.
>> 
>> No, I just said that _maybe_ it wouldl be useful to provide such
>> parsing functions natively (given the fact that various protocol use
>> SDP bodies, as SIP and XMPP).
>> 
>> I'm fine with parsing SDP bodies in custom JavaScript code however :)
>> 
> 
> 
> I don't understand the need for it to be SDP actually: Javascript
> already has native and efficient ways to describe information (JSON,
> XML), if SDP is what everybody wants then it would be easier to just
> map SDP over them.
> 
> L.