Re: [rtcweb] realiable data service

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 19 July 2011 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6979A21F8764 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gcK7tZfhE80B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B6C21F855D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-4a-4e258e556b8d
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 27.0E.20773.55E852E4; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:01:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:01:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4E258E54.3010206@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:01:56 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <4E0832FE.7010401@ericsson.com> <4E1DC07B.7000807@ericsson.com> <D1BE71E1-4F3B-474E-8A28-AA53CE6B684E@cisco.com> <F43A8952-0CF3-4683-923F-DF1ED0B4344B@phonefromhere.com> <992E0971-8B50-4459-8779-78EC8F0C3AEB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <992E0971-8B50-4459-8779-78EC8F0C3AEB@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] realiable data service
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:01:59 -0000

On 2011-07-18 20:21, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
> Tim, I agree with your concern here. My largest concern of not
> specifying something is that it just means we will see a million
> different things done in JavaScript. That's pretty much what we have
> in the IETF today. Lots of protocols implement a different
> reliability layer on top of UDP. 

I would note that the the JS library at least is going to run on top of
a congestion controlled and secured datagram service. Thus, any
implementor can primarily hurt themselves rather than the network.

> However, it has not been all that
> bad and it has been very hard to get the transport guys to go and
> define one that everyone can use (I've presented in transport asking
> for this in the past). The end result has not really been all that
> bad. The protocols work even thought each one did there own
> reliability systems so I have not been all that worried about it. I'm
> not sure DTMF is a fair example to compare to...

I can't resist this bate as a transport guy. Well, things don't happen
for free, and no one was willing to stick in there for the long haul to
actually define it.

There also has been a lot of political resistance, and the fact that
transport development in OS etc happens at glacier speed, unless someone
well connected enough truly wants something.

I think a reasonable, re-use as much as possible, sane proposal has some
chance. And we WG chairs should try to get early feedback from TSV-Dir
etc so we avoid late surprises.

Please note that this is not an a comment in any direction around the
support for reliable data service. Just trying to provide some
background and feel for the land.

cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------