Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing

+1, let's not put too many things together.

Lorenzo

Il giorno Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:58:40 +0200
Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> ha scritto:

> I think we should skip both these use cases for the time being.
> 
> I think we have more than enough to design and agree on to get
> real-time audio and video (with recording) and p2p data. There are
> design choices to make and agree on all over the place (from user
> consent to RTP).
> 
> Besides I think that the most obvious (WebEx-like if you want) use
> case for A is document sharing and slide presentations - and we all
> know that there are several such services available already. So the
> pieces to build them are already available.
> 
> So my 2 cents say: let's push this into phase 2, and focus on getting 
> phase 1 out in a timely manner :) Sorry for not being enthusiastic.
> 
> On 2011-09-19 09:02, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> > WG,
> >
> > There where some discussion in the Interim meeting last week about a
> > Screen/Application/Desktop sharing support use case. My take away
> > from the discussion is that this use cases is likely well enough
> > understood to actually start a consensus call now. However, to us
> > WG chairs it was clear that the use case in question actually needs
> > to be split into two parts.
> >
> > A) Where the RTCWEB enabled browser can use a local application
> > window, the whole desktop or a Screen as a media source that can be
> > encoded and transported over the peerConnection for
> > displaying/playback at the peer.
> >
> > B) Where a remote peer can provide one or more input types such as
> > mouse and keyboard to control the local system, not only including
> > the browser, but also other operating system resources. This
> > clearly can only happen after additional consent, most likely on a
> > per occasion consent.
> >
> > My interpretation is that A only allows for application sharing in
> > conferencing contexts, like in the WEBEX session the Interim
> > meeting was held with where we shared slides. Where the combination
> > of A and B is providing for VNC/Remote desktop.
> >
> > Thus the question to the WG is the following.
> >
> > 1) Do you support or object the inclusion of use case A, B or Both
> > in our Use case document?
> >
> > 2) Do you have additional comments for or against either of the use
> > cases?
> >
> >
> > As WG chair
> >
> > Magnus Westerlund
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> > Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

-- 
Lorenzo Miniero, COB

Meetecho s.r.l.
Web Conferencing and Collaboration Tools
http://www.meetecho.com