Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability

Note also that pre- and post-processing of media are not covered by this
proposal, those concepts are in the domain of MediaStream (and
post-processing is possible today through various methods).

In fact, I think the primary novel features of this proposal are:
- SessionDescriptions are true objects, instead of wrappers around SDP
- Additional control over the ICE Agent

However, no use cases have yet been outlined that require this
functionality.

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
<fluffy@cisco.com>wrote:

>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Rohit Puri wrote:
>
> > Based on our experiences at TenHands Inc. where we are trying to build a
> RT video-centric collaboration service, the goal cited in MSFT proposal (
> http://html5labs.com/cu-rtc-web/cu-rtc-web.htm) namely:
> >
> > "Flexibility in its support of popular media formats and codecs as well
> as openness to future innovation—A successful standard cannot be tied to
> individual codecs, data formats or scenarios. They may soon be supplanted
> by newer versions, which would make such a tightly coupled standard
> obsolete just as quickly. The right approach is instead to to support
> multiple media formats and to bring the bulk of the logic to the
> application layer, enabling developers to innovate. "
> >
> > sounds like a great idea.
>
> and every proposal from any company or individual that I can recall being
> sent to theses WGs has had exactly that property. So it is sort of
> disappointing to see Microsoft present it as if their proposal was somehow
> different in this regards.
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>