Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Tue, 09 December 2014 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE3C1A8A8D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:57:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nkHmLzxoY3l for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0E21A8A95 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r2so1385695igi.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:57:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=DmsFuZqbkZYdTSOH39a/5zEtA4LkgGZLrPsz6Ctx5kc=; b=hv5JiafxECPATJplkqsQuHz3zJ9xVeAZxAvbu8nKIZF2Se6ixRzuh+1vVf1ShrzxdX vPV18R510kIVKttxkX4ezidfTkhJXyE8iWrU+qmfWJwpY4oHgSD+iwmqF6Di9biuKE24 UOHsicExxJMkufVWXbznearHmdlPEPQJD4azYWxtLBOjLhDwrBEN91yMz9RuvP+whxqA BkTEn8RX0MLDjrSprxVREjGPiy7aHzLB1JeEidkxdy5NLALxdpPEyCyHCDPz9VEK3fUA oi00brUbazHJj3geEd5b5fA7Oe9VkMZoh3Vqs+JriI+VyFNBnt+sC4bHju/7bVPKkQ4r aQlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlT61MNKN5KUgdT9g04Uw3ayHd0ehnC+L7/OqgjFAljn2MQb+rMjpNAyZG9haXBuFWsiHVi
X-Received: by 10.50.79.229 with SMTP id m5mr3640113igx.10.1418147844875; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i3sm880130iod.19.2014.12.09.09.57.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548737C7.1010102@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:56:23 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com> <5487331F.8050404@bbs.darktech.org> <5487353D.8030106@gmail.com> <548736AC.6000407@bbs.darktech.org> <CANO7kWAuEg5Ft9XkUdqWrMi__pZ=o7tEy22HWUxeHyo-1bWS3Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANO7kWAuEg5Ft9XkUdqWrMi__pZ=o7tEy22HWUxeHyo-1bWS3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060606040508020602040202"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/F3FkNf3dJF5g2-8uMJ0tRRTqlGI
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:57:31 -0000

On 09/12/2014 12:55 PM, Simon Perreault wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:51 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org 
> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> wrote:
>
>     That said, I echo Simon's point that until Apple and Microsoft
>     officially declare their intent to implement WebRTC they are not
>     "implicated", hence they should not really get to vote.
>
>
> Just for the record, I did not say that.
>
> Simon

Sorry for misquoting you. I think it was Tim Panton who first hinted in 
this direction.

Gili