Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the fingerprint attribute?
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 18:07 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E561B28E3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-dVTcwM6cU1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040CA1B2930 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t60so1453410wes.28 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BJ4MolwNxW0ib/kmOf8tDBy+4TxCxrVot/uAVKo/WbU=; b=sPn2wLFLqTQlqoGrQGUNasFwFIHkPRsmuNLiurObvRAUVZf3cpatWhD5r2NZNi47wq 2dYkcrhgw/CnIaRXu7wN9tbR/P9fgEK++LpTthxHmfmOg5o6S6WjwD354YQzSIn8/rPq 2NmUIkOlIOzDF3ww6QQdNlhldeEuiK4LIuS7L95k3KvVuGdv6dxO/c/X3amdUHHBrNbF EEvjhsjZKJoKJV3NoeHA82mW9lQrmRhLZyFzguivsTbPqK/L0RytL43e3WLSUx5nU4T5 jae0ndFUKpLYHX9MXvBQJdpvSnCUaIMEgO5I58VKb/1uxdmn+z6RBbYNMNEDK/a2rlEO QkOQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.210.239 with SMTP id mx15mr6672435wic.65.1405102028633; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.110.6 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWFnPbCuPtrTjR0LfSnW-b0s9752MZo02Cd_Sdne7DtAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfmwrik8TMb2J=33WzR1mc+X1usq2vVBZW=u-PbX17sdaw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWFnPbCuPtrTjR0LfSnW-b0s9752MZo02Cd_Sdne7DtAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:07:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXNfNdAq6HzS7dWKAFY9LoCBBOFemK7daSMWbgzydHTZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/FKRXsG00TTmb8cdClOp4B9K4h94
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the fingerprint attribute?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:07:14 -0000
On 11 July 2014 11:05, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 July 2014 05:26, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote: >> >> hash-func = "sha-1" / "sha-224" / "sha-256" / >> "sha-384" / "sha-512" / >> "md5" / "md2" / token > > > Firefox supports sha*. We will not support md* and don't believe that > we are obligated to. Forbidding md* might be a good idea: > https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/security-arch/issues/10 Oh, and I forgot to add, like Chrome, we will *provide* sha-256. For the near term, that is what we consider to be the right choice.
- [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the fingerpri… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Which hashes are valid for the finge… Martin Thomson