IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 13 September 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB20D11E812F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5+mK2uDx+wv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s15.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s15.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9948B21F9AED for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W76 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s15.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:06:41 -0700
X-TMN: [T7hbGN8jLNSRFL1B7AnzegHr0d1qmIiA]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W7668BB4545720CC4D9590C933B0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_dc46c097-d47f-4247-8a06-92140ae640a3_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:06:40 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDmCwhqwEiG_mGcG0J9TujR+dhwvhV9_9JOSfB777FZWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMAvdtq_gufKmDNCNCL+kKcxyi0MGUoVHetd9_DzbEdEnA@mail.gmail.com>, <BLU169-W111E8BA8C5A1AF65A7031F4933B0@phx.gbl>, <CA+9kkMDmCwhqwEiG_mGcG0J9TujR+dhwvhV9_9JOSfB777FZWA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2013 18:06:41.0276 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF7F6BC0:01CEB0AB]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video Codec Selection Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:07:01 -0000

Ted said:
"If you believe the MTI should be VP9 or H.265, you are welcome to propose either; please do so"
[BA] I am not prepared to argue for (or against) either VP9 or H.265 at this time, and I believe that many industry colleagues would say the same.  In a way, that is the point -- minds have not yet been made up, as in (many cases) they have been on the topic of VP8 vs. H.264.  
"It's not only generals who fight the last war" -- Dan Gardner

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status