IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06

Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Sun, 29 December 2013 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58031AE28F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:04:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjoTI0jF_PJD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:04:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vsp-authed-02-02.binero.net (vsp-authed02.binero.net [195.74.38.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D20B1AE2AD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:04:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.binero.se (unknown [195.74.38.28]) by vsp-authed-02-02.binero.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:04:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.50.32] (81-224-110-16-no227.business.telia.com [81.224.110.16]) (Authenticated sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se) by smtp-02-01.atm.binero.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0C1B03A169; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:04:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52C08E4B.7060903@omnitor.se>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 22:04:11 +0100
From: Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <5280E181.20104@ericsson.com> <52AE2C51.5000600@omnitor.se> <52AEC405.6070107@alvestrand.no> <52AF672B.2090100@omnitor.se> <E6CB9269-46BA-44E7-AA23-FF778AA9EBF1@lurchi.franken.de> <52BEF74A.2070601@omnitor.se> <7E087676-1C91-47D3-82E8-08C034780AAF@lurchi.franken.de> <52BF364D.5030801@omnitor.se> <968915A0-18BD-477B-BA70-7B891819BFFC@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <968915A0-18BD-477B-BA70-7B891819BFFC@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:04:29 -0000

On 2013-12-29 19:50, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> >
>> >I think rtcweb-data-channel usage of SCTP need to require to get the report about the failure.
> I think there are onerror callbacks...
Right. There are both onerror and onclose.  So, it is just missing 
information on when and why these are called.

/Gunnar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email