IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Resolving RTP/SDES question in Paris

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 19 March 2012 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754FA21F8643 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pbH7AtPMvfe3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C6121F850C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so733612vbb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=CWxd6df0ZiXi9UbEOkrmowHmbeWR78GxAAdWr7bJar0=; b=cx1FbvxKWPgsGuvREG5xOixqQlVr1VSZCFXbAmCVd/CSUizB0Bv9Qzi0Cb5ia5eedW VT8lgdSuignovfJs4nNsBZ+TzpNEAdReePuZFFVM6+hL2hEv9XoeTCWpRpFLj3czkEdb +h9AcOhG96vTQHG4WO/rlVBxAZ5NlPESDpR2Xl0WIS6+mrywYZC3l8lfmW2cu1fgaT/G dwDX/SbebClQhc1ll0nRAGbzYYAtAJ1ziRTslheuLoDuc8JzK5TOb4ChB353WYsWgc6n KBotLBPUIJ2c6P7TfuKQrbvg4vxNjFbU4sbyx3YmH9UMokPtq9xEGbKfGiAFiHth3eqL QDYA==
Received: by 10.220.140.196 with SMTP id j4mr5249169vcu.22.1332163788063; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.170.165 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 06:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E1FF09B@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com>
References: <4F4759DC.7060303@ericsson.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E1FEB69@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfnkYVEpmPV-zSL_4wOY-HiFZN-qJCQCiioaS=5NaqhLZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvtOAxMBx6xDnyfTnEq76oDEm6uj1xL6wGjjrtKUAHy3g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNZiotPmCfT53uEo+O0xw4xv6tXW1M_G-3A5BHuncsduA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvYOY5JZ2mYNGiH1poUBQkyOOycePFijH5H+SxtcdqujQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVe-b6Sv=R67bMJk_NQqQwdrRUn6rBm7Gu_CMcfPQwtEg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvZbEJ7sV4WPAYoQapzMR_QwAftj-oKg=ioMKHNT792wQ@mail.gmail.com> <6F428EFD2B8C2F49A2FB1317291A76C113563C5A92@USNAVSXCHMBSA1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAD5OKxuhiF9nasBsNpKH05d-Xt9LoD+ySHUvcxm3w=3rb8Oerw@mail.gmail.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E1FF09B@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:29:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfnSBosp74gxw_hiNw09qZVysKxGd0f4i9t3-ze+ynFhnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ravindran, Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbIyzIQVXndA8RCmjFrGV4JrIfYA6rV0q3qmfLCOtq6nHWCG8MKUul+IvHsQ6nxeyGLF5Z
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Resolving RTP/SDES question in Paris
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:29:52 -0000

2012/3/19 Ravindran, Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>:
> I’ll add more usecase to strengthen RTP usage in WebRTC.

Partha, instead of showing usecases in which SRTP is not fully
required (due to VPN existence or just localhost with no Internet
connection), please identify just a single usecase in which using SRTP
is *bad* or *worse* than using plain RTP. Just one.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email