IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] DataChannels API and external negotiation

"piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> Mon, 01 April 2013 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <piranna@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D895A21F81FE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TNRTb8hNB0DR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9129821F8881 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 02:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hm11so2002701wib.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 02:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EoHnXmOva8fCkB1uQycMBFLuIedgqZsrVrIsxbqeBoI=; b=s3sifl3CRnoa7/W8iEbPcH24jIXftxiPAqCPXyFSdjRbSyVmFmfeqVEdxxxc+e+YKi 7zd0n91XI9uMz5rBQ1KAZkgVsXFlosrs/LpwpnjqH6b37W15YtIaP3WrB3hDkcPM6yJi 4VZWr+GtFB8WcJ7ryIWCpGgiHZjN0wlwijjXlDPkpvlzKQVgSq1lzAi6LoVGxoRvAggs SUWbYm/tBcD9nX9DvYwZuK7QGQam9WQIPZCQ6aAlOTxpriAmsPpY5lmhSRc8Og3oZtnd Okr9QGcC7cZEotA83efJ7fVCci4/73ti9iBCFrY1eCIjSQsIL8Vncrn2sKKqVMDc6ajs 1tzg==
X-Received: by 10.194.20.40 with SMTP id k8mr14875311wje.16.1364809569736; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 02:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.219.135 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 02:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E629AF4F-FA49-46FE-A677-684F4CC80454@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <5158F0FC.3070104@jesup.org> <CAKfGGh1kBajiFFNknf5HtV2GF=wi7pGm6sbwiJhLFsmwhLecuQ@mail.gmail.com> <E629AF4F-FA49-46FE-A677-684F4CC80454@lurchi.franken.de>
From: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:45:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfGGh2P491bwGS-rPniAz98_p4Jy0K9opmA2P_1r6HFOeHfdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:25:01 -0700
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DataChannels API and external negotiation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:46:15 -0000

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

2013/4/1 Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>:
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:15 AM, piranna@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> /* If either maxRetransmitTime or maxRetransmitNum are set, it's
>>>   unreliable, else it's a reliable channel.  If both are set it's an
>>>   error.
>>
>> I don't think so (except if it's a limitation of SCTP that I didn't
>> know, so this message is useless). I think it would make sense to be
>> able to set both maxRetransmitTime and maxRetransmitNum at the same
>> time, only that since they are maximus limits it would be effective
>> the first to be reached.
> SCTP allows setting a single PR-SCTP policy packet. Supported ones are
> limiting the number of retransmissions and time to live. Not a combination
> of both. That is why you are only providing a single PR-SCTP value.
>
> If you want to limit both, you need to define a new PR-SCTP policy. That
> policy would also require two parameters (the number of retransmissions and
> the time to live in ms) as parameters, not only one as we have currently.
>
> So without defining a new PR-SCTP policy, the above text is correct.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
>> monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
>> Unix."
>> – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
>>
>>
>



-- 
"Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
Unix."
– Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email