Re: [rtcweb] Non-media data service consensus and requirements

Manuel Simoni <msimoni@gmail.com> Wed, 29 June 2011 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <msimoni@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D90811E8075 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rhEcYseNu+qY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFDE11E8070 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so1325550iye.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cM23K4MeTkkEhBoy6bzDeREShwWyKnbp9vr+aR94x5Y=; b=gBlWoNSH7JKDl9X4/u5WFW2S1on6FB3akvvc6o2DPPs2GVpRyOyIPmL9bka+RFRPx1 xOamTsvV6Ka81w7FWn4Jd8Jc8M2WZksIEEt7u63+/1lgJ8kLz3Ra2gB2ARjBg1e3G3dL uqlF+HcWk1o5QGAH5NWborPaVVjhYzv8W1GYU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.155.4 with SMTP id s4mr779140icw.32.1309351958054; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.222.74 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 05:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E09E621.6080109@ericsson.com>
References: <4E0832FE.7010401@ericsson.com> <BANLkTimxtCSbb0pkx1wSimOZkEtjVsg8fg@mail.gmail.com> <4E09E621.6080109@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:52:37 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinO8OyF7=aNZbPjrMXZieG_AJZ3nA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Manuel Simoni <msimoni@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Non-media data service consensus and requirements
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:52:39 -0000

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Magnus Westerlund
<magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> When it comes to reliable data I interpret you being a supporter for it.

Yes.

> However, can you elaborate on any usages you see for reliable object in
> web-applications to try to see if there are any requirements we are
> missing.

A use case would be an audio/video chat program, with the ability to
transfer files/documents between peers without needing server-side
storage.