Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524331AD5DA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:14:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTGg_JSdLZVz for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:14:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849931AD5C7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:13:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local ([12.216.224.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB5JDgeS029533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:13:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [12.216.224.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
Message-ID: <548203E2.90602@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:13:38 -0800
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gaelle Martin-Cocher <gmartincocher@blackberry.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com> <547F60A8.3080302@alvestrand.no> <27F838F1-326D-48BD-B553-6FE993E5C34F@apple.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF354465@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <547FA924.3000504@mozilla.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF35455C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <548052E7.1050007@alvestrand.no> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF359C76@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
In-Reply-To: <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AADF359C76@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Fywo7gb7aVywlkAXFtIK6yYXQ34
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:14:01 -0000

On 12/5/14 10:56, Gaelle Martin-Cocher wrote:
> Is that a google position or just an assumption?

We speak as individuals.


> Assuming browsers have to implement both and that this question is out of the way.

I was about to make the same point that Harald did, but he beat me to 
it: the questions were asked together because the nature of the 
compromise was, for many people, "I'm okay with X if and only if Y". 
Characterizing this as an unconditional acceptance of one without the 
other is ridiculous.

/a