[rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00.txt

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 15 October 2012 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A33321F8620 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.365
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.365 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDQz4gzVooyX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D2A21F861B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C4A39E1A6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZPZqkv3Um5I for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:1:be30:5bff:fede:bcdc]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BC2D39E16A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:38:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <507C3C0E.7060006@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:38:38 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <20121015163131.3756.11599.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121015163131.3756.11599.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20121015163131.3756.11599.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090502000200000308030305"
Subject: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:38:43 -0000

As the chairs asked for - here is some written input for the video codec 
MTI discussion.

    Harald


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00.txt
Date: 	Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:31:31 -0700
From: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: 	harald@alvestrand.no
CC: 	agrange@google.com



A new version of I-D, draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Harald Alvestrand and posted to the
IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8
Revision:	 00
Title:		 VP8 as RTCWEB Mandatory to Implement
Creation date:	 2012-10-15
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 7
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00


Abstract:
    This document recommends that the RTCWEB working group choose the VP8
    specification as a mandatory to implement video codec for RTCWEB
    implementations.

    This document is not intended for publication as an RFC.


                                                                                   


The IETF Secretariat