IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] How to multiplex between peers

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Wed, 20 July 2011 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <emil@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9DB21F8A7A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Up2ZKh5eI-H for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B9521F8A62 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wy0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 26so94996wyj.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.201.207 with SMTP id fb15mr1738795wbb.113.1311160137440; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porcinet.u-strasbg.fr ([2001:660:4701:1001:21e:c2ff:fe1b:2fe]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gg16sm103308wbb.17.2011.07.20.04.08.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 04:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E26B747.2010003@jitsi.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:08:55 +0200
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Organization: Jitsi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; bg; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <4E259EAD.3060505@ericsson.com> <FAE78F7C-8C51-41C4-B3D7-6497396E12A5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FAE78F7C-8C51-41C4-B3D7-6497396E12A5@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] How to multiplex between peers
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:09:04 -0000

На 20.07.11 02:43, Cullen Jennings написа:
>>> We have in our draft: 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-rtcweb-rtp-usage/
>>> looked at two possible suggestions for explicit multiplexing.
>>> Either a thin shim layer primarily consisting of a identifier
>>> that through negotiation is bound to a context, like an
>>> particular RTP session or a datagram channel.
>
> The problem with this is that if you are talking to a device that
> does not support this you forever have to go through some
> intermediary gateway that strips the byte. Just like turns servers,
> this reduces the user experience by adding latency and jitter and is
> expensive to run due to the bandwidth required.

How is this different from implicit multiplexing and talking to devices
that don't support it?

Emil


-- 
http://jitsi.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email