Re: [rtcweb] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Mon, 18 April 2016 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8795A12DD80 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=CnP/rhea; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Pw4UvQmT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9SovMmnU450 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FCD12DD5F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A12820BCF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 03:26:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 03:26:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=UU7A5jY24bwXnfJy4vrC2mNmAuw=; b=CnP/rh eamTc/vG+2WQjPOYDI15vuOMT8TULuZoIjZI787oRvW40hBCQx7yrDr1/Zy+2bHE h7koM4A2EoLGX9gZUZOkWhLlzFxact+D75DxJ7eG0S82f7OLqACyj2O2OyaYzcXz 3d1qOa0aN8RH2FVnqqwH4Vs9mJaE6O7ZpntgY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=UU7A5jY24bwXnfJ y4vrC2mNmAuw=; b=Pw4UvQmTunxNr6ua6jAg/ukfmXRAsP4v8Btd+yIg/6TBKwI wjgySgLWdDZBObWc10ZJfk1lmU0hygDHmTgiQhHzDuX/Lib7vGrjdsHg5Pomvp11 FbBw37h2InGAG79Poud0nGZcy2LhFOua5Ogkvsso8enMsZ+wixTdnKJdm/CA=
X-Sasl-enc: Y/rZbHOx0aHcltYO8xe3BvZbq/Dv9ORA3GfjY83JZHwI 1460964405
Received: from [10.0.151.254] (unknown [212.183.128.129]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ED95BC00017; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 03:26:44 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238)
In-Reply-To: <57147435.1040400@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:30:59 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E9D27D91-A2FE-45A6-987C-0E4634E1ADBB@fastmail.fm>
References: <20160415125624.15172.9206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <57147435.1040400@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/GKyZW_A1N92X5fUdjdZM-CC8foM>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:26:47 -0000

Hi Harald,

> On 18 Apr 2016, at 06:44, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> 
>> On 04/15/2016 02:56 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> In Section 5: AEC is a SHOULD implement with no reference. Is this well
>> understood to be implementable without any reference?
> 
> I believe the concept of AEC (echo cancellation) is sufficiently well
> understood that it can be implemented without a reference.
> 
> Specific echo cancellation algorithms are typically quite fluid and/or
> proprietary; I do not believe that the Internet would benefit from
> referencing any single AEC algorithm.
> Two endpoints do not need to agree on an AEC algorithm to function.

Ok, fair enough.

It would be good to expand the acronym for ignorant people like me though.
> 
>> 
>> In section 8: acronym VBR is used for the first time without explanation.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>