IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 24 January 2019 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE780131182 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:14:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ReqfODljuwMa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:14:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe32.google.com (mail-vs1-xe32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE53F13117F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:14:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe32.google.com with SMTP id x28so4410131vsh.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:14:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PmIGoy7EtMfjz9hbaqbUQc3St6UsipPRzhtgX8qbwmM=; b=kKnNVF2jvdOaf2aHQiwJzATuP+mZmAmB3rbnAlnCvH4jjpWzHvyIO1xya+Jnqrmu8n A4ZlppQPtg6AtvkXhnmGfhYgssAJxyBLO5DMSqmk/f2aeXAtfm922AAsH2CBfoTln3ql RJDb4B5gSx42bZUfiyKSfFkmw+ygH1/aGXFgPXfGgQrGdsB5fUncc+csWjmO25m4e6Su hJZl5uOalrQjJ56ypayikpwegpMSVdof4WT0JMT0rqXomv9/DmDIb1vwFrvBECnX1zeV B5XxabP0+HIUxwWRjqlpe9a8SpSUrm+wdCxm7UTlN/v2vl4llwh6HXnPKnreUeWwQP04 CHPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PmIGoy7EtMfjz9hbaqbUQc3St6UsipPRzhtgX8qbwmM=; b=Sln9ta/LYfRe4ZbPP1CeR47fHjR+FrVE/uh/a9tk0XJQHjOBp/1xWOvVCYAxSLi6MH vOncqjoMfYFnPoJIJMH5/uJPMJUIMmY9Xp8C8QTZ5Mvi7an8DrLr6ErwVyq1EFb+qAlP JhtGTyDfUMLXLXFA7/+u8n1chGHW8XbltPmfM+vwanR66DQmL+5LcaLiiFRqPqTVy5aj mUGAVgx4WBr6wpAVMjKXSgx22vFZpErApYMjRO3k3furGiYQuBGuk5MLUlx9mhEVjgkk GvB+lRMwSeNmb9KbZE+ruL/LvQTqerw6BCuSoWPU/udNfvHnP7XH/cOsGMYsLo4Stt9m ZLFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdu8uRB2Gty8zCztwF6ijK0YEqTvomx12iI9xenWrNUu+ZuwiIt PYy9uGcP1qiTCuhlP3keszP6apTQJKnLboGcxh9Ndw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7B+SCuegamzE2tMZjivPua59NSYdhF22cR2u4d2ZWAhJ3EVpQNUSDhE3TP1akZtc5IbN9JogsZXSBwX6pGZnU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:820f:: with SMTP id e15mr3396500vsd.156.1548364442747; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:14:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <97ed2641-8a7e-19a9-be38-a3458ca9212e@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxserd+XKm-6a1kCZ1tMbm4imF+OasgO7CHXgoF-gmFTsA@mail.gmail.com> <8a06e138-964a-251d-43bf-7eee3a2e67dc@nostrum.com> <cf0a8f1b-f008-293c-8ea9-31fd38ce1687@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <cf0a8f1b-f008-293c-8ea9-31fd38ce1687@nostrum.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:13:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGS4622ObrgiTNh2bNGu1_H7EEeGvtp14yMbSJAtwiyKBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000097c7e105803ab001"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/G_Z-4vzFf5bFA-l0vOgHEHQQBog>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposal to break the ICE impasse
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:14:06 -0000

Thanks Adam for the proposal. I do feel this is a reasonable way forward

Thanks
Suhas

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:03 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 1/24/19 3:02 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> > I don't think that's true -- the way JSEP specifies trickle ice,
> > offers for trickle ice will always start with zero candidates, and so
> > the trickling will always use UDP/DTLS/RTP/SAVPF from the start.
>
>
> Of course, I meant "UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF"
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email