[rtcweb] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-24: (with COMMENT)

["Barry Leiba" <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-24: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well written -- thanks!
I just have a small comment:

   This document uses the terminology from
   [I-D.ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy] and
   [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-overview].

I'm not making this a DISCUSS, but I think that definitions of
terminology that are necessary for the understanding of the document need
to be normative references.  I think that makes those two references
normative, not informative.