Re: [rtcweb] Update of future interim meeting locations

["James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>]

At 04:09 PM 4/17/2012, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Marshall Eubanks
><[e-mail]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Eric Rescorla <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>> First of all, the chairs would are going to declare that there is WG
> >>> consensus for a 1:1:1 meeting rotation between west coast of north
> >>> america, europe, and east coast of north america and plan to run
> >>> approximately equal number of meetings in these locations.  In
> >>> counting the number of past meetings in a given region, we will
> >>> include all the face to face RTCWeb and WebRTC meetings as this work
> >>> is closely joined and a large number of the participants travel to
> >>> both sets of meetings. The face to face meetings that happen at the
> >>> main IETF or W3C meetings are included in this count. Collocated
> >>> meetings will be counted just once as they only require one set of
> >>> travel to that location.
> >>
> >> Cullen,
> >>
> >> Thanks for this clarification. Just to be totally sure I understand,
> >> do you mean the following algorithm?
> >>
> >>   For an interim meeting at time X, sum up all the prior meetings
> >>   for each of the regions. The region with the fewest prior
> >>   meetings is then selected for the next interim. [0]
> >>
> >
> > Which implies that  Paris doesn't count.
>
>That's certainly not what I meant. Perhaps it would help to rewrite
>"next interim" as "interim X". Concretely, to select an interim meeting
>in mid-September, I would expect to count meetings up to and
>including Vancouver.

why don't Paris and Boston (I think that was the last interim, though 
that might have been CLUE) count here?

James


>-Ekr
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb