Re: [rtcweb] [Ice] [MMUSIC] [art] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 07 September 2018 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5F9130E48 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.309
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wEca59EukU9A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0582130E42 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1536344935; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JHlvtc3OJoZJi/Nc7/DKZREYFh9TX1155vm2taA36v4=; b=ImKB5G4/xTv9MjmlLLHXldQdtZkj/Q27cncw4I/JPmBc/fsGDY2QQvxi6OaNWB/l ZYn+1AfNIHaoB98Vn7/WqhKUhwyNclmQ9RbuX9CtMiUZb5GrNA4k3jxyQi5KypVj 2tkgMCP8fnpOtd3rCRMEigmj93iwKHuBU4R8g4Q3xf0=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-fe1ff700000055da-2e-5b92c36626f3
Received: from ESESSMB504.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.122]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 79.80.21978.763C29B5; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:28:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESBMB503.ericsson.se (153.88.183.170) by ESESSMB504.ericsson.se (153.88.183.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:28:54 +0200
Received: from ESESBMB503.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.186]) by ESESBMB503.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.186]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.003; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:28:54 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
CC: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ice] [MMUSIC] [art] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238
Thread-Index: AQHURh+v3CEVPFpjI0266oWKAGTzsaTj3MoAgAED/QCAAEOkYA==
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 18:28:54 +0000
Message-ID: <486e6b6c689445ed936cb3717c71341d@ericsson.com>
References: <15d3b114-5c04-61c4-8a62-61d8a414143d@nostrum.com> <7D1A35C5-FF09-4F93-ABA8-74D877952EF0@iii.ca> <f9404aeb-ea43-3f29-d668-fd7095016caf@nostrum.com> <250E036A-63AB-4705-BFF5-288704FB40CA@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <250E036A-63AB-4705-BFF5-288704FB40CA@iii.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.153]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7lW764UnRBv1PGS32/F3EbrHirofF /lOXmS0+rP/BaPHtQq3F1OWPWSzW/mtnd2D3WLLkJ5PH5fMfGT1m7XzCEsAcxWWTkpqTWZZa pG+XwJXx7ckr9oJ3chVv/6o1MHbIdTFyckgImEj8mTyfuYuRi0NI4CijREPzL1YI5yujxLWP e6EySxklvvc3MnUxcnCwCVhIdP/TBukWEXCSaH/6CqyGGaS7tXsRI0hCWMBN4v6x+6wQRe4S /a2XWEF6QRq2zQ8AMVkEVCQmNnKBVPAKWEvMvn+HDWLVZUaJdfMXgrVyClhJTJnxAcxmFBCT +H5qDROIzSwgLnHryXwmiA8EJJbsOc8MYYtKvHz8jxXCVpLYe+w6C8guZgFNifW79CFaFSWm dD9kh9grKHFy5hOWCYxis5BMnYXQMQtJxywkHQsYWVYxihanFiflphsZ6aUWZSYXF+fn6eWl lmxiBMbcwS2/DXYwvnzueIhRgINRiYfXf8+kaCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivK51QCHelMTKqtSi /Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK8Fn6bo4QE0hNLUrNTUwtSi2CyTBycUg2MtYvnO5tWr3Dm9VolJJ/a LpPa7HudQXzqKoGQ/ynhVQJb/kaK12Ve3cVyRPlbD/eSQGVPBndngUfqz34f3v/yZWhyYerS Xcu6d+it/73Kb+bOv1VnN/KnLNwi4cqRL3l0cse+SXOyBP1StpSYX1f68m+B+8JFbleuc1/q 57qTb/ZDUzh+yp2tSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAFUIjLbUCAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/H2as9RzlRQIEhFoy-QT_pcRZUIg>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] [Ice] [MMUSIC] [art] [clue] ICE, ICE-bis, and Cluster 238
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:29:09 -0000

Hi,

>That’s a very useful graph but when I look at the what is actually used in the purple links, >most of them seem they could trivial work with any version of ICE with the exception of the >few places trickle is used and need the explicit stuff around how to deal with trickle. 

Trickle is based on "Emil's table", which is one of the major things we did in 8445. So, if you implement that for trickle, you've implemented most of 8445 :)

The other major thing we did in 8445 was the removal of aggressive nomination, which many seem to have done in their current implementations anyway...

Regards,

Christer


> On Sep 6, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 9/6/18 3:24 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> I would propose that instead of the parts of specs that use the trickle mechanism purely reference that part of the new ICE spec that defines the syntax and say to transfer trickle candidates.
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, it's not quite so simple. The mismatch with trickle-ice is only the most obvious problem. In practice, there are a few dozen places where unpublished documents in the cluster refer directly to one version of ICE, and indirectly to another, or indirectly to both.
> 
> To help wrap our collective minds around this issue, I've put together a dependency graph that shows which Cluster 238 documents refer to which version of ICE. The red lines indicate references (directly or indirectly) to RFC 5245, while the purple lines indicate references to RFC 8445. The thickness of the line indicates how many hops away from ICE the reference is. Dotted lines are informative references.
> 
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/art/wiki/c238
> 
> To put a finer point on this, it took me a couple of hours to pare this graph down to something that was small enough to look at and actually understand -- there are actually twice as many documents involved in this mess, but including them makes the situation too confusing to even start to get a grip on.
> 
> Everywhere you see a purple document with a red arrow or vice-versa is a place we need to figure out how to handle this mismatch. You can push the boundaries around, but the count of mismatches is pretty much the same no matter how you do that. On a first order estimation, this is days -- or, more likely, weeks of work. And I'm talking about person-hours, not calendar time. If you can do this, or find someone to step up and do it, then your proposal would be a viable alternative to the one that the ART ADs have proposed. Short of that, I'm not sure how we can do what you want.
> 
> /a
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

_______________________________________________
Ice mailing list
Ice@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice