IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 14 September 2018 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A2C130DCB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FHDYml3B2yU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A2D130DC4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id b129-v6so4794227pga.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=LgRIPOSVePtYz2kKSlMsbig0DqRcw1TygWqhhbuBcHY=; b=BZC6KmFq4OAD8pP8YMGy9Rwd8J0t3dIU9+KaaRUySeMTR9QSgYyHvOvM3QyGAlidfC v39mAUG66bEtfY15hU0r6dxEzHoTdrRhoAw5NKfZwgadadjiht5mwYtNXnJY7mm8wyeo KBkAkV1zHzshQcFdCkMfyp/zuoxRWC/tt+SjqLGCVUM/2B3DAMw3P/4hy1NZfhOtd+VE uQqEmthz3nYEuksQUIRW04Ir28hf/7N52DToJKBccA/FbeKD0Vjem1/8qKsdkUe/uRss HbtkJI9PeUdPLU/xY8Jute6RFAsWQ/+cCrblH7fU4ZkO9YjBp4YxZvfvBZsFV79oezRQ bl5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=LgRIPOSVePtYz2kKSlMsbig0DqRcw1TygWqhhbuBcHY=; b=LCKDaGkiwRCny5WKqWk2IRSGkbeB+CpWpU5HfinCX9yr3Eg4ROXPlgLhwHBtLdQnW2 zRfgZwTpT7esliteZ+tVly5Uw8nMDbyJI2BBcr6Ls+NdI8A+KWRZA7HcXL8ul0IRkquu ApnUiITly02HVw39bOoBjxCCqutydWJ4dopNYMfEyAjQIs72yGhOwjScsihfYGgTO9PR y6mpK2wGOex5OSSyEXWZnGj2j9O40kvhNQENKJpzr+FH9M6G5uaKcdYlpVpWPVOA9Pk4 KVWDa7McPdB5Dp3sOPv22rUSOx80nVmE1Oyz3HX43mlwjKcK3L41g3Vdo6hqErABvAWx v1ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A2J/gAi49gFTc3MJFOG9lIgPwjpIQAfBvP3KXiEKfhXfYV/Ihw J9mc1amn/ptu0ZQsaXBq4Dugnb4C
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYn8A9xoiLNwRnQcwpuEWLbnk0mQq/IJC7EL2iWNDOF9Oot1/q+wm+gbUiW5CmKjs/o6Wb9ig==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8591:: with SMTP id w17-v6mr13906495pfn.77.1536951346565; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:8658:7f45:5433:3218:7f20:2992? ([2600:380:8658:7f45:5433:3218:7f20:2992]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4-v6sm9145880pfm.137.2018.09.14.11.55.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <E33840DD-0E89-40C2-9CFF-E1A798007C7B@westhawk.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:55:44 -0700
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <84F2BA5D-3B55-4B75-A8BE-C36852BA251C@gmail.com>
References: <CAOW+2dtkNjzS0DkD37SD=POtC2Nd6Xe=upyjvVoyBnnMw7qwbQ@mail.gmail.com> <E33840DD-0E89-40C2-9CFF-E1A798007C7B@westhawk.co.uk>
To: westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/H3pPdq9B1qErN-xirhSIiz12UOk>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:55:50 -0000

Good point. In that scenario (where getUserMedia isn’t called) the current permissions model wouldn’t even allow presentation of alternative output audio devices (e.g. speaker or headphones). 

> On Sep 14, 2018, at 10:47 AM, westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> I’d argue  that sendonly video is also impacted - things like town-hall meetings etc
> T.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email